Canon CEO Very Dismayed by Brexit, Could Halt Japan Recovery

chauncey said:
Perhaps Fujio Mitarai might first ask himself why did Brexit occur
The EU's open border policy, with associated terrorism, is what drove the Brits away.
Economics wasn't even in the equation. Japan's closed door immigration policy has kept it safe.

Absolute balderdash, if I may say so! What drove us out was lies by the Brexiteers on immigration, the availability of funds after we stop paying the EU and assorted other jingoistic dog-whistles, all of which are now being walked back. Terrorism did not even play a marginal part in the debate...
 
Upvote 0
Ladislav said:
Time to join political discussion - sorry folks but I can't help myself.

@rfdesigner - respect. Very well written post and probably a type of information people were supposed to get from both camps.


I'm EU citizen (Czech) living in UK for past 3 years. I came to UK because US technology company offered me a job here so I simply decided to have a bit of adventure with no risks as it was within EU and still close to home. I never considered this a permanent relocation. It is just a new experience and than I will move back.

I don't claim any benefits, I'm even not eligible. I don't have children yet so I don't put pressure on local schools. When I or my wife need health care treatment and it is not urgent we actually travel back to Czech republic (always for dentist) as British healthcare totally failed our expectations. IMHO NHS stands most probably for No Healthcare System. On the other hand I give tens of thousands pounds per year on my taxes to British treasury.

A lot of what I heard during campaign was offensive to people like me. Before the campaign I felt like foreigner working in another EU country but after what was said in past few months I sometimes feel like and unwanted immigrant (in the worst meaning) and burden for UK economy.

I'm caught of guard by the Brexit vote result. Not because I don't respect the result, democracy or British people or because I'm very fond of EU but because I don't like uncertainty. Right now I feel a lot of uncertainty in my life and the uncertainty is not related only to my stay in UK but also to the future of EU affecting Czech republic as well. Any business in general feels this uncertainty - that is why Canon CEO said that.


Let me ask you a question:

A lot was said about influx of EU citizens coming to UK but when the real number are put on the table, is it really so bad?
- UK population: 65M
- EU citizens: 3.3M
- UK expats in EU: 1.2M

That makes net influx of EU people to UK 2.1M - some 3.2% of the population. Consider all the claims of the EU immigration impact on social and health system, schools, housing and even transport. Now tell me - do you really think that 3% increase in population (slowly growing over many years) is really what put the pressure on all public services? Isn't this just hiding incompetency of many people in charge behind an external factor which is easy to blame?

Off course there is a question about how to slow down the influx of EU people to already overcrowded country but what about non-EU migrants? Why is EU migration blamed so much when UK government is not able to control even non-EU migration where they have all the tools available?

I'm also pretty interested how will Brexiters work on all those trade deals they promised. A simple example:
A lot was said about pursuing trade deal with China which would benefit British economy. I know nothing about trade deals but it seems to me that in discussion of such a deal China would be superior to make demands before it even happens. In my opinion free trade with China would make issues with cheap China's steel crushing British steel industry (Port Talbot) look really minor.

Anyway it will be very interesting to see how this ends up and what deal will Britons get at the end - mean how far it will be from what was promised during populist campaign. I made few friends here and I wish you guys all the best in this leap of faith.

I think your experience of the NHS is most unfortunate, in my experiece it has been pretty good, but local problems do make certain areas less than desirable, I suspect that is the same the world over. Life expectancy in the UK is higher (just) than the US, and it wouldn't be if the NHS was really all that bad, I would argue if you are seriously ill the HNS can be great, if you've just got a tooth ache then no it isn't terribly good.

Pressure of numbers: 2M in 65M doesn't sound like that much.. problem is the rate of those incomming, which is about 150% of the natural growth. Property prices don't reflect the overall pressure, but that at the margins, i.e. not the pressure of putting 65million people into homes for 63 million, but putting say 4 million people who need new homes now into homes for 2 million. Also note, the majority of migrants are of an age between leaving full time education and beginning a family.. so your 2M extra are primarily in one very small age group, one that given a few years is requiring school places, this is where the pressure on school places for my youngest is comming from (substantially bigger classes, much fewer school choices), my eldest two being that much older are unaffected.

I never claimed (unlike some politicians who I am less than keen on) that the NHS was the way it was because of immigration, the primary reasons for NHS problems are: bureaucracy of the NHS, aging populaiton, people taking it for granted (my sister in law works for the NHS and the number of missed apointments is criminal).. it could also do with more funding.. but that has always been true.

Non-EU migration can also be a problem for some areas, the EU is slightly to blame for that as it can provide back doors (though I forget the exact mechanism), but the UK governemnt is also to blame. Point is once we're out the governing party can no longer blame the EU for half the countries ills, it will be their fault through and through which will make it easier to hold the slimy toe rags to account.

Now I voted not on where the UK is right now but on the trend from past to potential future if nothing changes, and I look at my kids and realised their chances are being eroded every year.. so hence I voted the way I did.

Trade Deals.. This is going to be a problem, equally it isn't as big a problem as is usually incinuated. Too many people run around saying "there's no trade deal" like you need a trade deal to be able to trade at all, trading without one isn't as good, but you usually can trade. Of course we will need to rebuild our diplomatic core competancies after they were destroyed when we joined the EU.. so it's not a quick fix, but my timeframe extends beyond the middle of next week, I voted on my childrens and my grand childrens future.

I also wish you the very best, under an "australian based points system" (to quote a phrase) I'm sure you'd still get in.
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
scyrene said:
davidmurray said:
Also agreed - this is an off topic thread for this non-political forum and the initial post and entire thread should be removed due to its political nature.

... That this is political and essentially outside this forum's remit, I agree.

Forum name: "Canon Rumors"

Topic title: "Canon CEO Very Dismayed by Brexit, Could Halt Japan Recovery"

Seems quite topical to me.

::)
 
Upvote 0
rfdesigner said:
...... Of course we will need to rebuild our diplomatic core competancies after they were destroyed when we joined the EU.. so it's not a quick fix, but my timeframe extends beyond the middle of next week, I voted on my childrens and my grand childrens future.

I also wish you the very best, under an "australian based points system" (to quote a phrase) I'm sure you'd still get in.

All that would have been privatised by now. I'm sure there are plenty of companies offering precisely those kinds services, clamouring right now to get their cv's on the table. I wonder how much they'll be able to charge.

As to your grandchildrens future. Not sure voting away their right to work, visa free travel and access to public services in almost 30 countries, will be helpfull to their prospects moving forward. Everyone might seem to want to come to Britain now, it isn't necessarily always going to be that way. Besides, young people now interact with their peers in other countries in very different, very immediate ways that were not possible 25, 30 years ago. In areas where there is a real dearth of quality, meaningful work. The young will have to get a whole lot more creative in the way they make their way in the world. The internet has connected everyone, rowing back time by putting up barriers to movement is a Canute-esque bottleneck to collaboration.
 
Upvote 0
josephandrews222 said:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/brexit-unleashes-chaos-among-global-currencies/2016/06/28/82323c2e-3c8f-11e6-84e8-1580c7db5275_story.html?wpmm=1&wpisrc=nl_rainbow

A rather balanced article, I think.

Quite informative.
The only problem with this article is that it only looks at Britain's decision to leave the EU from a financial perspective. However the most negative impact of this bizarre decision is going to be on our cultural life. Sharing ideas, knowledge, beliefs and values benefits us all and I am horrified that a new barrier has been created that will impede that cultural exchange. Europe is such a diverse and culturally rich community and we in Britain are now going to be poorer in every sense of the word.
 
Upvote 0
The only problem with this article is that it only looks at Britain's decision to leave the EU from a financial perspective. However the most negative impact of this bizarre decision is going to be on our cultural life. Sharing ideas, knowledge, beliefs and values benefits us all and I am horrified that a new barrier has been created that will impede that cultural exchange. Europe is such a diverse and culturally rich community and we in Britain are now going to be poorer in every sense of the word.
Alas, wisdom from a child
 
Upvote 0
Untitled said:
rfdesigner said:
...... Of course we will need to rebuild our diplomatic core competancies after they were destroyed when we joined the EU.. so it's not a quick fix, but my timeframe extends beyond the middle of next week, I voted on my childrens and my grand childrens future.

I also wish you the very best, under an "australian based points system" (to quote a phrase) I'm sure you'd still get in.

All that would have been privatised by now. I'm sure there are plenty of companies offering precisely those kinds services, clamouring right now to get their cv's on the table. I wonder how much they'll be able to charge.

As to your grandchildrens future. Not sure voting away their right to work, visa free travel and access to public services in almost 30 countries, will be helpfull to their prospects moving forward. Everyone might seem to want to come to Britain now, it isn't necessarily always going to be that way. Besides, young people now interact with their peers in other countries in very different, very immediate ways that were not possible 25, 30 years ago. In areas where there is a real dearth of quality, meaningful work. The young will have to get a whole lot more creative in the way they make their way in the world. The internet has connected everyone, rowing back time by putting up barriers to movement is a Canute-esque bottleneck to collaboration.

The problem is, you assume my children are highly successful top of the class types.. much as I love and adore them this is not the case.. unfettered migration is great for the winners but rather less so for the losers.

Anyway I don't want to end all migration, we should still have substantial migration, just in managable and balanced numbers. Currently over 200k people leave each year and over half a million come in, that is not substainable in a finite island, and as far as I'm concerned it's the difference that's the problem, if it were half a million each way there would much less of an issue.

Also I don't see why we should be preventing well educated people from elsewhere in the world, particually the commonwealth, but instead allow anyone and everyone in from europe, I want a level playing field.

As always with these discussions people focus on the migration. For me that's only a third of the problem, the other two thirds are the costs (including the horrific trade deficit) and the inability to control our own laws.

Agreements with europe are great, being ruled by the EU isn't, especially when I believe they are going in precisely the wrong direction on many issues.. hence their economy is in such a mess.
 
Upvote 0
rfdesigner said:
Anyway I don't want to end all migration, we should still have substantial migration, just in managable and balanced numbers. Currently over 200k people leave each year and over half a million come in, that is not substainable in a finite island, and as far as I'm concerned it's the difference that's the problem, if it were half a million each way there would much less of an issue.

Also I don't see why we should be preventing well educated people from elsewhere in the world, particually the commonwealth, but instead allow anyone and everyone in from europe, I want a level playing field.

I think the figures are 180,000 from the EU last year, and 184,000 from outside the EU. So I rather suspect we are letting people in from the Commonwealth. Never has been 500,000 coming in!
 
Upvote 0
rcarca said:
rfdesigner said:
Anyway I don't want to end all migration, we should still have substantial migration, just in managable and balanced numbers. Currently over 200k people leave each year and over half a million come in, that is not substainable in a finite island, and as far as I'm concerned it's the difference that's the problem, if it were half a million each way there would much less of an issue.

Also I don't see why we should be preventing well educated people from elsewhere in the world, particually the commonwealth, but instead allow anyone and everyone in from europe, I want a level playing field.

I think the figures are 180,000 from the EU last year, and 184,000 from outside the EU. So I rather suspect we are letting people in from the Commonwealth. Never has been 500,000 coming in!

http://www.migrationwatchuk.org/statistics-net-migration-statistics

the 188/180 is net, it's about 270/270 gross, half a million total... so we both need correcting
 
Upvote 0
Ian_of_glos said:
Sharing ideas, knowledge, beliefs and values benefits us all and I am horrified that a new barrier has been created that will impede that cultural exchange.

Really? :o

Last time I checked, the UK was still in the same patch of bleak north-east atlantic. We haven't left the planet (even if some politicians have). We can still visit other nations and exchange ideas. I've witnessed people from around the globe, on this very forum, communicating and exchanging ideas. And, sadly at times, in a civil manner too. ;)
 
Upvote 0
GuyF said:
Last time I checked, the UK was still in the same patch of bleak north-east atlantic. We haven't left the planet (even if some politicians have).
Not according to the Dr Who episode I saw, they just want you to think you are still on a planet. In reality, you're on the back of a space-whale ;D
 
Upvote 0
AvTvM said:
CanonFanBoy said:
...
Poor AvTvM: The only person I've seen on a board who could be given $1,000,000,000 and then complain about the paper cut he just gave himself... or the stupid Bureau of Engraving slapping out $100 bills.

:)

The way things are going, I might be complaining if I were offered 1 Million Pounds instead of 1 Million Euros ... :P ;)
 
Upvote 0