Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS USM

  • Thread starter Thread starter tianxiaozhang
  • Start date Start date
Deva said:
I have the non-L 100mm myself, bought many years ago before the 'L' was available. Does anyone who has upgraded from the 'non-L' to the 'L' have a view whether they can see a material difference in image quality? These are some of the flowers in our garden, taken today.

I have used both and own the L, there is zero material difference in image quality, the only way to tell the difference in some images is by the bokeh, it is much smoother with the L due to the different shaped aperture blades. In your images 1 and 3 would look indistinguishable with both lenses, but image 2 would look slightly different in the background.

Unless bokeh is a major concern IQ is not the reason to "upgrade", however the other niceties might be; bokeh, IS, internal focusing (lens stays the same length) (my mistake, they both have internal focusing), weather sealing etc were enough for me to get the L.
 
Upvote 0
A little in-camera multiple exposure.

JPJO9x6.jpg


One shot ISO 1600, f/11, 30 seconds for the night sights. One shot 1/200, f/11 with flash (can't remember the power off the top of my head) for the rest. Just a bit of standard adjustments in LR, contrast, NR, sharpness, plus de-saturation of blues as my backdrop can sometimes turn a bit blue under flash lighting.

I'm sure I could have done this with one long exposure + flash but I had never used the multiple exposure feature of my 5D3 and wanted to play with it a bit
 
Upvote 0
rpt said:
TWI by Dustin Abbott said:
leftnose said:
One more in the same vein. 10 sec. exposure (obviously!) and second curtain sync.

Nicely executed. Photography done right
Seriously nice! Fantastic!

Thanks! Initially, I just wanted a straight lume shot with no motion but I accidentally wound the watch while setting it up so the plan changed. It turned out a bit better than I might have hoped because you can actually see the individual beats of the chrono hand.
 
Upvote 0