privatebydesign said:unfocused said:This discussion has gotten boring, redundant and reeks of tin-foil hat conspiracy theories.
Interestingly not one of the critics has provided any credible evidence that DPReview's findings are wrong. Instead it is all about little quibbles with the way reviews are written, with the conclusion that the reviews are not glowing enough to satisfy some Canonites.
It's time for everyone to just move on. DPReview is a privately owned site and they are entitled to test cameras in the way they feel is most productive. If you disagree, well...no one makes you go to their site. And, if you think you can design tests and report results in a more objective manner...well knock yourself out. No one is stopping you.
The only question I have is how much longer I will have to wait for the full 1dx review.
I have.
I have linked and posted the image Rishi took in the 5DS/R review that says that the camera couldn't take that image without showing banding and noise in the shadows. That is a lie.
I (and Sporgon) have also posted similar setup images that demonstrate it is a lie.
No, actually, you haven't. None of your images have anything to do with the conditions of my/our images.
And therein lies one of the biggest issues with your type of arguments: you think your own example represents the sum total of all types of conditions a photographer may encounter.
Whereas our example represents one situation a photographer may encounter where the competition would just do better.
Upvote
0