Is the first spec list not just literally the 1Dx mark II specs? The list with 20 megapixels even says Cfast 2.0 and 16 fps, and the mark III definitely uses CF Express. Also says no log recording. I cant find anything in the first "leaked" list that isn't from the 1DX mark II. The other spec list that says pixels not specified looks much more accurate.
Edit: as Pekr also just pointed out, Dual Digic 6+ is also the same as 1Dx mark II.
I agree. I just pulled out my 1DXMKII specs and you can just lay them over these, with a few exceptions. Could this be a joke?
61 AF points?
The big draw for me and the vast majority of the sports shooters I know and work with is the OVF.
All the enhancement to focus with the LCD mean virtually NOTHING to us.
With all the fanfare and fireworks about video "and no LOG on the fire" (bad joke) but you can get a better video camera for less than half the price with so many more features and better ergonomics for video.
Why go to CFExpress for 20MP's ???? This makes no sense.
On the credibility scale I give this a "3" out of "10"
If this is true "who the heck" on the pro/agency level is going to buy a bunch of stock to replace all their MKII's ???
Canon can not be this stupid. I don't believe the specs and think it's just "Click Bait"