Aglet said:Skulker said:If by normal you mean about the same as Nikon I would agree with you. (why do I get the sneaky feeling you may not agree with me ;D ;D ;D ;D)
I have to agree, from what I see published on some web sites testing these cameras, the SNR of all the top line cameras is pretty similar across their ISO range.
Well I didn't expect that!!!! :-*
Aglet said:But I'll take the worse reported SNR of the D800 over the low ISO noise of any Canon product to date because it's less visible. MUCH less visible. And any bloke with access to both cameras can determine that quite readily with little more than Photoshop and ACR (or Lightroom) and a lenscap.![]()
Ahh that's more like it! ;D ;D Of course I could be countering with pointing out the 1Dx noise and DR at mid ISO's advantages, where I take most of my wildlife shots.
No offence intended - From my point of view I think we are all really lucky that current cameras are so good! I did consider a change to Nikon for the low light performance and the 200-400 lens. I'm please I stuck with Canon as they have now caught up on the low light issue. I would love the new Canon lens with the built in converted, realistically I'm not going to spend that much.
Happy shooting.
Upvote
0