GMCPhotographics said:Jack Douglas said:These compromises are a pain, for sure. Still we must navigate them picking what bugs us least.
Now I'm thinking I'd love to touch screen flip through shots and the 1DX II doesn't have it. Then I think, on camera, how often do I need to quickly scan a lot of photos since I often do this during idle times while waiting for my subject to show up. So, not a big deal.
OTOH, to be able to to touch focus faces in live view and not just video - much bigger deal for me.
Jack
Live view focus is a lot more accurate too. I took a photo of a Puffin off teh coast of Ireland a few years back with my 5DIII and a ef 400mm f2.8 LIS with a 2x TC attached. Wide open, the shots were a little soft. But when I engaged the live view focus...the results were spectacularly sharp. To be honest, when I got the files back to my laptop, it was hard to tell from the 100% viewing in lightroom if there was or wasn't a TC attached. It was THAT sharp, but using the normal viewfinder focus (which is far more practical and faster) the results were a lot softer. The 5DIII's ability to track is excellent, but the live view is a lot more accurate. So I'd like to try out the new touch screen live view focusing and tracking ability. I think the 5D4 has a lot more to offer than paper specs and the usability of the live view functions are a game changer for many. I can still exposure bracket easier in Canon's live view than I can with any other brand.
I agree, and thanks for this. I'm watching CR comments trying to glean all I can before making what looks like a tough decision. They have made the 5D4 look very appealing from my perspective.
Jack
Upvote
0