Canon EOS 6D High Resolution Photo and Video Samples

[Canon Rumors]

<div name="googleone_share_1" style="position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;"><g:plusone size="tall" count="1" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/09/canon-eos-6d-high-resolution-photo-and-video-samples/"></g:plusone></div><div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;"><a class="tm_button" rel="&style=normal&b=2" href="http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/09/canon-eos-6d-high-resolution-photo-and-video-samples/"></a></div>
<p><strong>From Canon

</strong>Canon has posted a bunch of images and videos made with the new Canon EOS 6D. As suspected, their results are terrific.</p>
<p>Have at it pixel peepers!</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/samples/eos6d/" target="_blank">http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/samples/eos6d/</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff0000;">c</span>r</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>

 

[Marsu42]

Canon has posted a bunch of images and videos made with the new Canon EOS 6D

The shots are taken with a 17-40/4 ... no wonder since Canon came up with an anti-5d3 af that trades in precision (*no* cross point @f2.8+ even in the center) for added low light sensitivity.

Imho the 6d is a "high iq landscape tourist camera body" - you don't carry around a f2.8 zoom anyway in this case, often shoot in dim light and have no need for a fast, precise or servo af. And with a fast prime you can mf and use an exchangeable screen that the 5d3 cannot use.

 

[Gothmoth]

because tourists use MF often?

no matter how we flip it.. it makes no real sense as an "ambitious amateur" camera.

 

[PerfectSavage]

Your link directs to 60D images and video from 2010, not 6D. Canon Australia has stills and video up here from the 6D: http://www.canon.com.au/About-Canon/News-Events/News-Press-Releases/IMR-EOS-6D/Sample-Images

<div name=\"googleone_share_1\" style=\"position:relative;z-index:5;float: right; /*margin: 70px 0 0 0;*/ top:70px; right:120px; width:0;\"><glusone size=\"tall\" count=\"1\" href=\"http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/09/canon-eos-6d-high-resolution-photo-and-video-samples/\"></glusone></div><div class=\"tweetmeme_button\" style=\"float: right; margin:0 0 70px 70px;\"><a class=\"tm_button\" rel=\"&style=normal&b=2\" href=\"http://www.canonrumors.com/2012/09/canon-eos-6d-high-resolution-photo-and-video-samples/\"></a></div>
<p><strong>From Canon


</strong>Canon has posted a bunch of images and videos made with the new Canon EOS 6D. As suspected, their results are terrific.</p>
<p>Have at it pixel peepers!</p>
<p><strong><a href=\"http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/samples/eos6d/\" target=\"_blank\">http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/samples/eos6d/</a></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style=\"color: #ff0000;\">c</span>r</strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>

 

[Gothmoth]

Australia has stills and video up here from the 6D: http://www.canon.com.au/About-Canon/News-Events/News-Press-Releases/IMR-EOS-6D/Sample-Images

only small sample images?.. pretty useless if you ask me.

 

[PerfectSavage]

Australia has stills and video up here from the 6D: http://www.canon.com.au/About-Canon/News-Events/News-Press-Releases/IMR-EOS-6D/Sample-Images

only small sample images?.. pretty useless if you ask me.

yup, but an order of magnitude more useful than 60D images and the video at least shows pretty decent DR; I'm sure larger ones will be up soon on the USA site or other Canon site.

6D video sample : http://www.canon.com.au/About-Canon/News-Events/News-Press-Releases/IMR-EOS-6D/Videos

 

[Gothmoth]

Australia has stills and video up here from the 6D: http://www.canon.com.au/About-Canon/News-Events/News-Press-Releases/IMR-EOS-6D/Sample-Images

only small sample images?.. pretty useless if you ask me.

yup, but an order of magnitude more useful than 60D images and the video at least shows pretty decent DR; I'm sure larger ones will be up soon on the USA site or other Canon site.

??

it´s the same images as in the link from the first post... only that you can´t downlaod the full resolution images from your link.

i don´t see any 60D images....

 

[PerfectSavage]

Australia has stills and video up here from the 6D: http://www.canon.com.au/About-Canon/News-Events/News-Press-Releases/IMR-EOS-6D/Sample-Images

only small sample images?.. pretty useless if you ask me.

yup, but an order of magnitude more useful than 60D images and the video at least shows pretty decent DR; I'm sure larger ones will be up soon on the USA site or other Canon site.

??

it´s the same images as in the link from the first post... only that you can´t downlaod the full resolution images from your link.

i don´t see any 60D images....

the 60D images are on the original CR link at the top of this thread... it's a bad link on Canon's site, it says "6D" but the page it directs to is "60D", the Canon Australia (canon.au) links are 6D images and video, CR's link is to the old 60D samples page.

 

[Musouka]

This sample movie was shot in Full HD mode and HD mode, and has been optimized for viewing on this website.

Wha? No FHD quality? C'mon Canon. This is 2012. You can use YouTube or Vimeo to host the high quality videoes if you fear for your bandwith. You know, just like Nikon.

In any case, the Deep Green video was shot in Yakushima, which a beautiful, beautiful place (but it rains there a lot!).

 

[DB]

link to Nikon D600 sample JPeG images:

http://mansurovs.com/nikon-d600-image-samples

Canon as above posted by Administrator in CR

 

[Canon-F1]

the 60D images are on the original CR link at the top of this thread... it's a bad link on Canon's site, it says "6D" but the page it directs to is "60D", the Canon Australia (canon.au) links are 6D images and video, CR's link is to the old 60D samples page.

nope, above link points to the correct 6D site.

Canon has posted a bunch of images and videos made with the new Canon EOS 6D. As suspected, their results are terrific.


Have at it pixel peepers!


http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/samples/eos6d/

 

[DianeK]

Here are 100% crops taken with both the Nikon D600 and Canon 6D using 135mm & 85mm portrait lenses @ f3.2

Hmm, Nikon looks crisper and cleaner to my eye between these two images

 

[DB]

Here are 100% crops taken with both the Nikon D600 and Canon 6D using 135mm & 85mm portrait lenses @ f3.2

Hmm, Nikon looks crisper and cleaner to my eye between these two images

It's definitely sharper, but a tad less flattering too - just look at the tiny blonde hairs at the bridge of the nose and above the upper lip too, sort of reminiscent of initial criticisms of the D800

 

[DianeK]

Here are 100% crops taken with both the Nikon D600 and Canon 6D using 135mm & 85mm portrait lenses @ f3.2

Hmm, Nikon looks crisper and cleaner to my eye between these two images

It's definitely sharper, but a tad less flattering too - just look at the tiny blonde hairs at the bridge of the nose and above the upper lip too, sort of reminiscent of initial criticisms of the D800

Different tastes, I guess. I prefer seeing those tiny hairs rather than the smudgy look of the Canon image because when doing macro work, I want to see those tiny hairs on an insect. I can always smooth out skin in PP, but for when I want the detail it needs to be there first place since I can't manufacture it in PP. Actually the Canon images looks like a rather amateurish PP job like I used to do when first learning photoshop Just my $.02

 

[Noink Fanb0i]

At least the Canon portrait model is prettier than the Nikon one.

 

[matukas]

Out of the camera JPGs? Maybe that's why they look as amateur PP?

 

[EchoLocation]

Here are 100% crops taken with both the Nikon D600 and Canon 6D using 135mm & 85mm portrait lenses @ f3.2

Hmm, Nikon looks crisper and cleaner to my eye between these two images

It's definitely sharper, but a tad less flattering too - just look at the tiny blonde hairs at the bridge of the nose and above the upper lip too, sort of reminiscent of initial criticisms of the D800

Different tastes, I guess. I prefer seeing those tiny hairs rather than the smudgy look of the Canon image because when doing macro work, I want to see those tiny hairs on an insect. I can always smooth out skin in PP, but for when I want the detail it needs to be there first place since I can't manufacture it in PP. Actually the Canon images looks like a rather amateurish PP job like I used to do when first learning photoshop Just my $.02

i agree. it's pretty sad on here when people are praising a camera for having less resolution and clarity in the images(is that all we can say good about this camera?)
There is no doubt the Nikon sample is much cleaner and crisper than the Canon which is not nearly as sharp and definitely a little smudgy. I am in China so it's a little more difficult for me than in the US, but tomorrow I will be ordering a D600 and 24-70.
I really wanted to like the 5DIII and 6D, but alas, both are overpriced and less of what i'm looking for than the Nikon offerings. I will probably sell my 550D, 5DC, 24-105 and Sigma 50mm soon(most sad about saying goodbye to the Sigma, the thing has amazing bokah!)

 

[K-amps]

Here are 100% crops taken with both the Nikon D600 and Canon 6D using 135mm & 85mm portrait lenses @ f3.2

Hmm, Nikon looks crisper and cleaner to my eye between these two images

It's definitely sharper, but a tad less flattering too - just look at the tiny blonde hairs at the bridge of the nose and above the upper lip too, sort of reminiscent of initial criticisms of the D800

Different tastes, I guess. I prefer seeing those tiny hairs rather than the smudgy look of the Canon image because when doing macro work, I want to see those tiny hairs on an insect. I can always smooth out skin in PP, but for when I want the detail it needs to be there first place since I can't manufacture it in PP. Actually the Canon images looks like a rather amateurish PP job like I used to do when first learning photoshop Just my $.02

+1... We pay for higher resolution only to want to smudge it? The 600 image looks so clean. And while the skin tones on the Canon seems a bit flattering (more reds), the 600 looks slightly realistic between the 2 images (on my monitor) . Looks like Canon had some extra AA filters in stock and decided to slap on 2 per body.

 

[PerfectSavage]

the 60D images are on the original CR link at the top of this thread... it's a bad link on Canon's site, it says "6D" but the page it directs to is "60D", the Canon Australia (canon.au) links are 6D images and video, CR's link is to the old 60D samples page.

nope, above link points to the correct 6D site.

Canon has posted a bunch of images and videos made with the new Canon EOS 6D. As suspected, their results are terrific.


Have at it pixel peepers!


http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/samples/eos6d/

Well, that's really odd. Perhaps it's a geography-based thing with the URL based on geo/IP... I'm in NYC and have clicked on both the CR link as well as the link directly on Canon's site with all EOS model sample pages... the one for 6D takes me directly to the 60D page every time, not a 6D page... I only see 6D images on the Canon Australia site link I referenced... Any idea why that's happening? I'd love to download high res. and the Australia site only has mid-res. images from what I can see.

For me, this link (in NYC at least) - http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/samples/eos6d/ - links to the 60D samples page - http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/samples/eos60d/ ...and even on Canon's EOS image samples page, it still directs me to 60D... You're 100% sure this link on the line above this takes you to a 6D page? Any idea why it doesn't work for me?

 

[Chosenbydestiny]

Here are 100% crops taken with both the Nikon D600 and Canon 6D using 135mm & 85mm portrait lenses @ f3.2

Hmm, Nikon looks crisper and cleaner to my eye between these two images

The Nikon crop looks sharper, no doubt. But I'm using two monitors here, one calibrated and one uncalibrated. On both screens the Nikon model looks like she has hepatitis. The Canon model, however, looks like a real person. Canon skin tone still wins for me.