Canon EOS 6D High Resolution Photo and Video Samples

[K-amps]

let us believe the 6D is as good as the 5D MK2 on low iso.

then maybe it´s best for now to compare the D600 to the 5D MK2.
how well fares the 5D MK2 against the D600.....

there should be enough good 5D MK2 pictures.

;D

Pun notwithstanding.... With a larger pixel pitch and 4 years newer, it better not be same as the 5d2 in ISO...

 

[Noink Fanb0i]

All the samples are now out!

Image 4=ISO 6400 (61-sec. Bulb exposure, why include that pic???, horrible blotchy color noise in the shadows)
Image 7= ISO 1600 (soft overall, light BG flatters noise performance)
Image 8= ISO 800 (doesn't look that sharp for the top-of-the-line macro lens, no visible noise, as expected)

Conclusion: Image 5 model is still cute & hot

http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/samples/eos6d/

 

[Marsu42]

sensor should be better.

Nope, the Photokina interview tells us it's the same thing - but banding will probably be lower due to more recent readout circuits. Why do you think the mediocre sample shots are only up to iso1600 (except the nightsky) :-o ?

 

[Marsu42]

maybe it´s my bad english.. with "should be better" i mean it is expected to be better because it´s a new sensor.. not that it is in fact better.

Ah, right, now I get it - I'm no native English speaker either... and new doesn't necessarily mean higher iq even in Canon's book, in the Photokina interview the exec clearly says it's a tradeoff w/ cost. So it's better for Canon, not for us

 

[joemod]

Image 4=ISO 6400 (61-sec. Bulb exposure, why include that pic???, horrible blotchy color noise in the shadows)

http://web.canon.jp/imaging/eosd/samples/eos6d/

This is the first time I am going to say this in a forum: "Seriously! WTF?!"