Cheap, economy cameras are always a big disappointment to people who need something better. And high end, expensive cameras are always a big disappointment to people who want something cheaper. So every new camera is a big disappointment to someone. If it's not designed for their specific needs and budget, then it's a big disappointment. There is no way to please everyone. That's why they make some ten DLSR models — each of them is not a big disappointment to someone.Canon-F1 said:if this is true the camera is a big dissapointment....
EOBeav said:Folks, it's been called a 'consumer' level body for good reason. It's for people who want to move up to a FF from a Rebel, and already have a few lenses, but don't have the coin for a 5dmkIII.
Get your 5DmkII while you can. You won't be disappointed. With this new camera, you might very well be.
Zlatko said:Cheap, economy cameras are always a big disappointment to people who need something better. And high end, expensive cameras are always a big disappointment to people who want something cheaper. So every new camera is a big disappointment to someone. If it's not designed for their specific needs and budget, then it's a big disappointment. There is no way to please everyone. That's why they make some ten DLSR models — each of them is not a big disappointment to someone.Canon-F1 said:if this is true the camera is a big dissapointment....
Don't think so... "Rebel-Users" mostly upgrade to something 'bout $900-1500 and I can't see them spending $1999 + Lenses (since most own EF-S-lenses anyway).DB said:then perhaps Rebel-users would be prepared to part with 2 grand for a body like this?
tomscott said:Why would it take SD when the 7D takes CF!? Seems a bit of an interesting choice...
Doesn't sound very promising IMO. Weather sealed, but 11 point AF so a new system there too along with a new sensor...
I think this one is a fake.
I expect the 7D/5DMKII homologation. Makes more sense, with the parts bin, and more value for the photographers.
kennephoto said:willis said:So we got then 5D Mark 2.5?
2.25!
to add phase detection on the sensor like the 650D and eos-m
- Why develop a new Sensor when Canon has three different FF-Sensors available?
maybe canon want to keep this precious 19 point AF to another higher model
- Why a new 11 Point AF and not the 19 Point AF of the 7D?
because Nikon D600 is 1/4000
- Why only 1/4000 when even the 60D offers 1/8000?
because 5D3 only has 1/200
- Why only 1/180 when even a 650D offers 1/200 and the 60D offers 1/250?
no idea, translation error
- What is an "EOS" Body? One similar to the body of the EOS 650D or one similar to the EOS 1Dx?
EOBeav said:Get your 5DmkII while you can. You won't be disappointed. With this new camera, you might very well be.
BXL said:Don't think so... "Rebel-Users" mostly upgrade to something 'bout $900-1500 and I can't see them spending $1999 + Lenses (since most own EF-S-lenses anyway).DB said:then perhaps Rebel-users would be prepared to part with 2 grand for a body like this?
The specs also look suspicious to me:
- Why develop a new Sensor when Canon has three different FF-Sensors available?
- Why a new 11 Point AF and not the 19 Point AF of the 7D?
- Why only 1/4000 when even the 60D offers 1/8000?
- Why only 1/180 when even a 650D offers 1/200 and the 60D offers 1/250?
- What is an "EOS" Body? One similar to the body of the EOS 650D or one similar to the EOS 1Dx?
I wouldn't trust this source...