Re: Canon EOS 7D Mark II Coming First Half of 2018 [CR2]
may be still no 4k but instead come with 1080p 60fps !!
may be still no 4k but instead come with 1080p 60fps !!
Upvote
0
Chaitanya said:Dont we already have a 7D mark II?
Here is one of sample pics from D500, its quite impressive camera and I know a lot of birders(who came to Canon system after 1st 7D as Nikon didnt release replacement to D300/s and now are back to shooting Nikon with D500 and 200-500mm lens)
unfocused said:Predicting new bodies based on past refresh cycles is a sure way to be wrong. Canon releases bodies when the technology and market is ready, not by some arbitrary schedule.
unfocused said:Guaranteed:
Likely:
Possible:
ahsanford said:...when's the last time a product line got refreshed faster than it did before? I'm hard pressed to think of when that was...
...yes, the 7D3 could absolutely come next year, but it would be rather un-Canon-like to do so. If it did, one would logically think the D500 + 200-500 combo was indeed doing market share damage to Canon such that it felt compelled to shake things up with their pipeline...
jayt567 said:Please Canon, less focus on video features and more on improving image quality, noise, high ISO, sharpness performance.
ashmadux said:Auto AF tine tuning? Oh, apparently Canon doesn't think we want that.
A) The 6D2 only has one card slot; it's not a wedding camera.jayt567 said:The time for for 4K was in the 6DII which is more likely to be used as a wedding camera
aceflibble said:The 6D2 only has one card slot; it's not a wedding camera.
And the 7D3 would not be primarily a stills camera?aceflibble said:B) The "time for 4K" was every camera in the last 18 months or so, but looking forward, it makes most sense for the 90D and 7D3 to get it over the 6D2 which is primarily set as a stills upgrade
Lurker said:Lets not forget the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami.
I don't know that Canon said specifically which products were delayed/impacted but I'm pretty sure they acknowledged that facilities and capabilities took a hit. The 7D II came out much later than expected at the time and there was the unusual, if not unprecedented, 7D update that was more than just fixes.
It seems misguided to expect the 7DII-7DIII refresh period to be in any way related to the 7D-7DII refresh period.
Mikehit said:ashmadux said:Auto AF tine tuning? Oh, apparently Canon doesn't think we want that.
From what I have read from people who actually used that on the Nikon weren't particularly impressed with it. Seems like one of those 'nice ideas in theory but needs much more work in practice'.
jayt567 said:aceflibble said:The main issue is whether it will have a low pass filter or not. The 7D line is analogous to Nikon's D500 and that Nikon has been moving sports and wildlife photographers over as the lack of filter makes it able to render far more detail than the 7D2. The 7D3 is going to have to either have no filter or have the filter but break new ground in APS-C resolution (think 30mp+ to overcome the filter) to stay competitive. With a filter on the current 24mp limit, the Nikon will continue to be the best choice for sports & wildlife.
A) The 6D2 only has one card slot; it's not a wedding camera.jayt567 said:The time for for 4K was in the 6DII which is more likely to be used as a wedding camera
B) The "time for 4K" was every camera in the last 18 months or so, but looking forward, it makes most sense for the 90D and 7D3 to get it over the 6D2 which is primarily set as a stills upgrade and a manufacturer's replacement of the 5D3.
Not a wedding camera yet Canon's own site has sample images from the 6D II of brides in their gowns.......interesting.
aceflibble said:The main issue is whether it will have a low pass filter or not...Nikon has been moving sports and wildlife photographers over as the lack of filter makes it able to render far more detail than the 7D2.