I believe I have high expectations for AF too, that is why I spent $7,000 per 1DS MkIII rather than $3,000 for the relevant 5 series at the time, but I don't take that to extremes, I don't worry about what my image looks like at 100% on a 27" monitor if I am going to print it at 12" x 18". I don't care which eyelash is sharpest in an image that when printed all seem equally sharp, it's just too easy to obsess at insane and impractical magnification sizes.
Sure there will always be applications where that performance is needed/desired, Alan's example of bird plumage when heavily cropped is one, but I'd venture that in general that isn't the norm for the majority of users.
Sure there will always be applications where that performance is needed/desired, Alan's example of bird plumage when heavily cropped is one, but I'd venture that in general that isn't the norm for the majority of users.
Upvote
0