remember? I still have a D6 and it was working last time I checked 2yrs ago.. I should check again
Canon never made a D6, to my knowledge.
Perhaps you are thinking of the D60?
Upvote
0
remember? I still have a D6 and it was working last time I checked 2yrs ago.. I should check again
You are correct. It was a D60. My bad.Canon never made a D6, to my knowledge.
Perhaps you are thinking of the D60?
Canon never made a D6, to my knowledge.
Perhaps you are thinking of the D60?
10 stops? I think that IBIS will be anything from 0-stops to infinity, depending on attention span.Ain't she a beaut?
- A
- Biomimetic gimbal design -- 10 stops IBIS for sure
- It's a drone, too
- Two lenses --> sees in 3D
- Battery life extreme provided you brought snacks
- It
maywill poop on you- Minimal eye strain unless you try to try to look through its rear 'viewfinder', in which case it plucks out your eyes
- Image transfer technology still being worked out
- Your $3500 investment may fly off into the hands of a Sony owner
Ah the D60. Easy to communicate by writing, somewhat tougher to say:You are correct. It was a D60. My bad.
3MP D30 then?yeah ... might have been, recall the naming scheme was different. Luckily I still have it.. so I can check when I get home. My only problem is the dates don't match.. it was bought for a wedding in 2001 and that doc indicates 2002.
Whether it makes sense to maintain two lines depends on whether they can max profit by maintaining two lines. Canon is going to have to figure that out. We can't.I think the transition will happen much quicker than 10 years simply due to lenses. In the shrinking ILC camera market all manufacturers have to rationalize costs and having to support two distinct lens lines for that length of time does not make economic sense.
10 stops? I think that IBIS will be anything from 0-stops to infinity, depending on attention span.
But Canon already has thrown in the towel on the EF mount - they are only working on R glass and have said so. So if I'm a photographer looking for a new camera, why would I buy into obsolecense?
I expect a few more R lenses this year including smaller F4 variants. So say there are a total of 15 R lenses by end of year. Yet if I buy a DSLR, I have no access to any of them. No chance of ever buying the compact 70-200 2.8.
Yet if I have an extensive EF lens collection, I can still use them seamlessly with a very compact adapter on an R mount camera.
This is obviously what Canon's game plan is. That is why to me it makes no sense to make a new 5D when they are about to announce the R5. I predict that the R5 is the new 5D.
How much better do you want the EF lenses to be? Are they not meeting your requirements? In what way are they lacking? I really am curious.
The camera's LCD was in selfie position.Goodness knows what they were dangling in front of that bird to lock its attention so.
Treats work for our dogs, but what is the treat dangler for a hawk? A mouse, maybe?
- A
Yep indeed - I actually had the Mk I version and thought it was very good but it was the II that really lived up to the promise of "replacing all your 2.8 primes".Surely you mean the EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L II? Rather than the EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L?
How much better do you want the EF lenses to be? Are they not meeting your requirements? In what way are they lacking? I really am curious.
In some applications OVF's and long battery life trump increased specifications on a sheet. I have no issues with mirrorless, but I have mentioned this before and I will mention it again, why do mirrorless proponents get so angry over the existence of cameras with mirrors? You act as tough they cannot coexist. I envision a day where my 1dx3 and probably a high mp R camera live in harmony each doing their designated task to perfection, wildlife / action and landscape respectively.
Just because I choose to own a camera with a mirror it should not diminish your enjoyment of your mirrorless model.
Birds like that can't move their eyes much, so they compensate by keeping their head still so they can have clear vision. Humans are able to move our eyes much more. So to achieve clear, non-shaky vision, we stabilize our eyes rather than our whole head.Goodness knows what they were dangling in front of that bird to lock its attention so.
Treats work for our dogs, but what is the treat dangler for a hawk? A mouse, maybe?
- A
You simply can't eliminate the DR difference by making adjustments (moreover the DR is often measured by making exposure adjustments). There always will be a range in shadows (or highlights) that's recoverable on D850 and not recoverable on 5DIV. And that range gets bigger on 7D.Yet you still insist that 1.5ev is a difficult shadow push and that ~1ev difference between the 5D4 and best Sony/Nikon bodies is large. It's not large, it's a processing adjustment.
So unless Canon is going to introduce something truly new in their sensor circuitry, the R5 sensor is going to deliver ~13.6ev. And if you process the DPAF data properly you find the circuitry is actually capable of ~14.6. (Again, DxO methodology.)
In what way is the Sony A7RIV worse than the A7RIII in the real world other than for file size?
Look, I know some people will now show me a load of maths to prove thier point however, this doesn't alter the fact I just don't see any negatives in real photos given the extra 20MP.
Who else had or has plans to buy into the RF body system yet keep their EF glass and potentially not buy RF lenses for quite some time? (or ever...I have 3 expensive hobbies and I can't make the others jealous too often) I really like my collection of Canon lenses and none of the RF's do anything for me focal length wise. This may change