Take my money! NOW! I hate edgy bodies.
I'm missing those curves already
Me too. I am hoping the R5 is more 5Dish in body style. Sonys are edgy and look like toys.
Upvote
0
Take my money! NOW! I hate edgy bodies.
I'm missing those curves already
Do you really believe that if the R5 body costs $3500 and the R6 body costs $1500?43 posts...you really want an explosion? Start this type of a topic on the R5 side. That body will sell 80/20 over the R6 (well, at least in the CR forumite demographic)
Yes. (See part about who)Do you really believe that if the R5 body costs $3500 and the R6 body costs $1500?
This would indeed be great!I hope they're as good as the Leica EVF's
I only have experience for a total of 10 minutes with a Leica and an R in a shop but the Leica is by FAR the best EVF I have looked through. It made the M5 seem like a toy. It made the Pen F seem like a steaming pile ofThis would indeed be great!
Are the R5 and R6 names confirmed? From what you have described, I could see the R6 being a MILC Rebel (albeit with some pretty good specs), either replacing the RP or being a bit larger with RP line continuing separately along he lines of the 100D series. The R5 seems to be 5D level camera. The problem with all that though is you would expect the R6 to have a higher number, as you’d expect at least one model, perhaps more, between it and the R5 in due course.I'm actually not sure where this camera fits in at the moment.
Why do you not choose to associate this with the 6D since full frame to full frame is apples to apples and Rebel to FF is a very far cry with the XXD line a much more tangible step closer if any crop is.Are the R5 and R6 names confirmed? From what you have described, I could see the R6 being a MILC Rebel (albeit with some pretty good specs), either replacing the RP or being a bit larger with RP line continuing separately along he lines of the 100D series. The R5 seems to be 5D level camera. The problem with all that though is you would expect the R6 to have a higher number, as you’d expect at least one model, perhaps more, between it and the R5 in due course.
Thanks for posting the information and I totally respect staying true to the source and not posting the video/photos.EOS R5 announcement of some kind for sure, I think the EOS R6 will be in May ahead of Photokina.
Learn to spot a joke when you see it.I'd rather Craig keep his word and the integrity of the site
Once you’ve seen R5, did you want to cancel your 1DX3 pre-order ?
Yay, another dynamic range war!They already have the best sensors in APS-c cameras(M6mk2 and 90d)
So just based on the body type variance alone, magnesium alloy vs not. RP Grip (smaller frame) then perhaps we are looking at a $1500-$1800 camera, and the magnesium R5 in the $3500-3800 range... Your opinions folks?
This information could've been in the R6 rumor page because it's not substantial enough to have its own page.
But with the extra resolution to compensate. So in reality equal DR if you sacrifice a bit in NR software.Yay, another dynamic range war!
In terms of the DR - no, not the best, although good enough. Still lagging behind Nikon D7200 from 2015 and behind Fuji X-T3.
But I'm more interested in the FF offerings, especially R5 and RS/R5s. R6 - probably not so much. But it's very good they put IBIS in it.
Is the R5 still a rumoured July release? Are Canon just going to do a teaser development announcement next week?
It seems you kind sir are the one missing the point.Learn to spot a joke when you see it.