The AE-1 is realistically the only one that makes sense for a Full Frame sensor + PCB.
The other designs are too cramped.
The other designs are too cramped.
Upvote
0
As the former owner of an FTb, AE-1, A1 and Canonet QL17, I vote for none of the above. I have to agree with Neuro. I like my R7, especially its size, but think the R6-2 has better ergonomics. Mostly I want Canon to stop changing the ergonomics with each new introduction.
Me too!"Mostly I want Canon to stop changing the ergonomics with each new introduction."
But the original F-1 or the New F-1? This post shows the latter. Anyway I see little use for a SLR vintage body style - but nostalgia. Making a compact rangefinder-like body is IMHO more interesting - not much because of the vintage look, but because of the form factor.F-1 for me. If it looked like the AE-1 I'd get them confused.
As the former owner of an FTb, AE-1, A1 and Canonet QL17, I vote for none of the above. I have to agree with Neuro. I like my R7, especially its size, but think the R6-2 has better ergonomics. Mostly I want Canon to stop changing the ergonomics with each new introduction.
I completely agree with you on the AE styling. Many of these now-retro cameras have a certain allure to them. I have a Minolta SRT-102 that was used by an uncle during his deployment in the mid-late 70's. I used it for a short time until deciding to simply preserve the camera. I just feel different when shooting with a retro or retro style camera. It truly does slow down the process, but in a good way. The X100V does the same for me, and apparently many others. It's kind of a back to basics approach that is refreshing.Having had a few FD camera bodies, way way back...I think the most hansome film SLR ever made by Canon was the AE-1 Program. One of the prettiest looking cameras of all time. I had one of those in silver and an A-1 in black. I've always rolled with 2 camera bodies.
Whatever the design, I'm sure it'll look good if they make it - I just hope they don't cripple it so hard that there's no reason to use it. I would love to see the R5 sensor in a retro body, WITH IBIS, though I wouldn't be too upset about smaller batteries even though it'd be nice to get the full LP-E6NH. Something about a retro body makes me nostalgic and makes me want to go out and make art. If it doesn't have that effect on everyone, that's cool! I also appreciate the more covert shooting, as people would think it's a film camera, at least until they got a lot closer (or if you had a white lens attached), putting you at less risk for theft, and it also makes people act more natural in my experience.
No way you could manufacture such a thing today and sell it for the $549 that will get you a mint one on eBay. (I sold mine a week after getting my 1-Ds MkI in 2002... the pro shooter was so happy to get one for only $2000, and didn't think digital would amount to much.)Just put the 1v back into production !
I have the F1n, it was my camera for many years until the AF and EF glass came. however, I would rather spend my (not so big) saving to own R1.Back in August, we spent a bit of time reading between the lines about a “retro” influences Canon camera from comments made by a Canon executive. This topic was brought up in response to the hype around Nikon’s Zf retro camera body. Now it appears Canon is actively asking customers which of their most iconic
See full article...