Basically I already wrote this post once and as I did it the answer became clear.
But because I have an afternoon off and nothing urgent to do, I try to reproduce my line of thought here.
Now, I live on a tropical island which is very fine but it shuts you off mentally unless you get out every once in a while. So this time I am taking off to Poland.
Why the hell should anybody want to go to Poland? Exactly. Some people who do say that it is absolutely fantastic because there are hardly any tourists, you get good service and decent quality for a price that is hard to resist. I brought up the subject with a Polish coworker who immediately lighted up and promised to arrange me some Very Personal services in Krakow and around the lakes etc.
Then I started pondering about should I take the Sony A6000 or the Canon 5DIII to take pictures with.
For the Sony I have the 16-70 zoom, the 35mm f/1.8 for low light and a Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 as wide. That would be a nice and light setup with all the situations I could possibly face. Except long telephotos, of course.
That would probably be the ideal setup for a traveller...with extra batteries and a charger of course.
But then I started to think. So many times I have been disappointed with the Sony because the autofocus has not managed to get it right. It is really annoying. Apart from that, the picture quality leaves nothing to hope for.
But when it comes actually to taking pictures, I like the certainty that the picture is there. This is what I get with Canon. I would probably take along the Tamron 24-70 VC zoom and the 50mm L for low light. Two batteries and a charger that I probably would not need.
This setup is a lot heavier and clumsier. But I'd be sure to get the pictures.
I will not be buying anything more.
I would be leaving home the 150-600mm Tamron, the 24mm, the 35mm and the 85mm L-lenses and the 17mm Soligor. And the Sony 20mm and the Jupiter 3.
What would you be carrying?
But because I have an afternoon off and nothing urgent to do, I try to reproduce my line of thought here.
Now, I live on a tropical island which is very fine but it shuts you off mentally unless you get out every once in a while. So this time I am taking off to Poland.
Why the hell should anybody want to go to Poland? Exactly. Some people who do say that it is absolutely fantastic because there are hardly any tourists, you get good service and decent quality for a price that is hard to resist. I brought up the subject with a Polish coworker who immediately lighted up and promised to arrange me some Very Personal services in Krakow and around the lakes etc.
Then I started pondering about should I take the Sony A6000 or the Canon 5DIII to take pictures with.
For the Sony I have the 16-70 zoom, the 35mm f/1.8 for low light and a Rokinon 12mm f/2.0 as wide. That would be a nice and light setup with all the situations I could possibly face. Except long telephotos, of course.
That would probably be the ideal setup for a traveller...with extra batteries and a charger of course.
But then I started to think. So many times I have been disappointed with the Sony because the autofocus has not managed to get it right. It is really annoying. Apart from that, the picture quality leaves nothing to hope for.
But when it comes actually to taking pictures, I like the certainty that the picture is there. This is what I get with Canon. I would probably take along the Tamron 24-70 VC zoom and the 50mm L for low light. Two batteries and a charger that I probably would not need.
This setup is a lot heavier and clumsier. But I'd be sure to get the pictures.
I will not be buying anything more.
I would be leaving home the 150-600mm Tamron, the 24mm, the 35mm and the 85mm L-lenses and the 17mm Soligor. And the Sony 20mm and the Jupiter 3.
What would you be carrying?