DIGIC is a processor, not a sensor.so... the specs says DIGIC 8 but that's a Sony sensor?
Me too - sort of....In my case, it will be to replace my ageing G12! It has been a trusty carry-along - but is now ready for retirement. I actually took one of my most commercially successful shots on it - testimony to the fact that light, subject, timing and framing are more important than the gear you have with you at the time!
Drat, no Dual PIXEL AF. I'll hold out hope till full specs are listed, but probably not.
I would say typically a M43 is better than this. But this one is pocketable and a 1" sensor is about the minimum sensor size to get decent A4 and bigger prints ( a bit of a sweeping generalisation as my old G12 produced decent prints at the time). Alot of these pocket cameras I've ended up with scratched lens. I wonder is the lens protected any better than previous versions. But its real strength is its small size. You can carry it always.Help me out those of you have have spent a good deal of time with this format. How does this hold up against M43? I thought that format would be a great travel size for me but the noise level over 3200 iso was a deal breaker (Olympus Pen F) I just went back to lugging the FF around and making the iphone 8 be my small camera. I do have an S95 which isn't too shabby so how much better is the G series over that?
Sure it would be, but sadly no amount of improved manufacturing process and extra computing power is going to make a difference in physics. Could they make a similar focal length lens in that size? Maybe? Would it cost so much that it's not worth it? Most probably.So it is faster. That's it? F1.4-2.0 lens would be something...
Seems likely given BSI, and why not? Many canon p&s cameras use Sony sensors. It’s probably a cost effective solution.Wait, what? Are they really using a Sony sensor?
Seems likely given BSI, and why not? Many canon p&s cameras use Sony sensors. It’s probably a cost effective solution.
Like a 28-84mm f1.4-2.0 lens (to keep dimensions small enough). That'd be a change. Now as it is, this camera is only faster which I don't need.Sure it would be, but sadly no amount of improved manufacturing process and extra computing power is going to make a difference in physics. Could they make a similar focal length lens in that size? Maybe? Would it cost so much that it's not worth it? Most probably.
Wait, what? Are they really using a Sony sensor?
Tilt screens suck balls. Swivel the thing, how hard can that be?