Canon Registers a Second Unreleased EOS R Camera

we need pocket size full frame and aps-c cameras. Think the EOS M6 line and equivalent 22-2 pancake. and a teeny tiny full frame box with a 40mm 2.8 pancake. i'd be in heaven if either came out.

EOS M6/M6 II were such rockstar cameras with superb controls and layout. a shame no successor. and the 22-2 pancake was so good.

Everyone else makes a FF box. why can't canon? Think Panasonic S9. I want my tiny Canon boxes with tiny lenses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 users
Upvote 0
That's very much in the eye of the beholder.
What makes a camera pretty or even iconic?
My opinion is, that every tool that delivers best ergonomics is "pretty".


And even this design maybe finds people that will call it "pretty",
Not me, by the way.
Agreed! Honestly, I am mostly in the Canon system at this point because of their cameras. I keep periodically trying the others via friends and stores, but for me they look terrible (for the most part) and feel terrible. Most of Canon's new lenses are way overpriced for what they do, imho, but the camera bodies are absolutely terrific.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
With all that has been said above, these look like they might be the anticipated PowerShot replacements. By all accounts, the PowerShot group has been rolled into the main camera group, so the listing numbers are likely ambiguous, and WiFi 4 makes more sense for a PowerShot than for an ILC. The recent Panasonic releases in this space have been uninspired and overpriced, and there is a big appetite in the market for a good compact or two. If Canon does a good job, new PowerShots could be a huge revenue opportunity.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0
Ah, it all comes together: The Canon R3 II is actually going to use a crop sensor — meaning it is also the R7 II; and it will be much smaller, like a pocket-sized full-grip square the size of a wallet — so it is also a Powershot; and in keeping with "3-series" tradition Canon will implement its new scent detection system for amazing AF control — but you probably need to calibrate it multiple times after eating different types of beans and tacos.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 2 users
Upvote 0
Am I the only one here yearning for a hi-res stills focused camera
Me too! that's why I've bought the Hasselblad X2D II :cool: The number of options in the hi-res stills focused camera class does seem to be dwindling though.
that re establishes Canon’s image quality leadership and competes with the A7R vi? Canon is the 35mm lens manufacturer with the quality glass that can truly utilize a 100 mp sensor. Canon, please give me a reason to stay.
Not sure about the rest of your message. Nikon, Sony, L Mount, Sigma and others (Hasselblad anyone?) have great glass too. Every major and minor lens system out there has different pros and cons.

I've stopped complaining about Canon not catering for my desires and wants and have spent my money on non-Canon gear. I'm not bitter, and as soon as Canon will release something I like I will consider sending money their way again. In the meantime my R5 keeps pleasing me and my X2D II serves me well indeed when needed.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Me too! that's why I've bought the Hasselblad X2D II :cool:

Not sure about the rest of your message. Nikon, Sony, L Mount, Sigma and others (Hasselblad anyone?) have great glass too. Every major and minor lens system out there has different pros and cons.

I've stopped complaining about Canon not catering for my desires and wants and have spent my money on non-Canon gear. I'm not bitter, and as soon as Canon will release something I like I will consider sending money their way again. In the meantime my R5 keeps pleasing me and my X2D II serves me well indeed when needed.
I don't see it as complaining, only hoping for an often mentioned high MP EOS to become real.
Having experienced the difference between the EOS R's 30 MP and the R5 II's 45 MP, I am ready for more! :)
 
Upvote 0
I don't see it as complaining, only hoping for an often mentioned high MP EOS to become real.
I fail to see any material difference :ROFLMAO:
I've been complaining a lot about Canon criminally ignoring the RF 35 1.2... I started hoping and then complaning, but not anymore.
Having experienced the difference between the EOS R's 30 MP and the R5 II's 45 MP, I am ready for more! :)
I'm loving the 100 MP of my Hassy :love: If only it had a long tele option....
 
Upvote 0