Hey guys I was wondering which would be better for achieving ~ 400mm focal length with the M. I would like to take some occasional pics of the moon. I've done it before and found 400mm to be long enough with a bit of cropping.
Option 1 - use my existing 70-200 f/4L IS and buy the Kenko 1.4x plus the EF adapter. Should be less than $200. Or Canon 1.4x II (used) for a little more.
Option 2 - buy the EF-S 55-250 STM plus EF adatptor. Total cost around $400.
Just wondering which option would yield the best results. L lens plus extender vs EF-S? Anyone have experience with either of these combos?
I like option 1 as it means I can also use the 1.4x with my 135L and it's FF compatible (plus cheaper).
Option 1 - use my existing 70-200 f/4L IS and buy the Kenko 1.4x plus the EF adapter. Should be less than $200. Or Canon 1.4x II (used) for a little more.
Option 2 - buy the EF-S 55-250 STM plus EF adatptor. Total cost around $400.
Just wondering which option would yield the best results. L lens plus extender vs EF-S? Anyone have experience with either of these combos?
I like option 1 as it means I can also use the 1.4x with my 135L and it's FF compatible (plus cheaper).