DxOMark scores for 5DMkIII out - total score 81, 5DMkII had 79

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who cares what the DxO says, or if the camera you own can interpet the "matrix" code better than another? This is stupid. If your camera can perform well enough to please the human eye, without worrying about numbers and patterns that don't mean anything, why complain? Just go out and take pictures. If you can shoot in manual mode properly, you shouldn't be worrying about DxO stats.
 
Upvote 0
marekjoz said:
tron said:
81>79 No worries... ;D

With d900, when they reach their up scale limit, they will have to reevaluate all the numbers so it will fall down, most probably :)
Now you ruined my calculations :(
I was thinking: 3.5 years 2 point increase => 31.5 more years: 18 points increase which means 99!

So by the year 2044 Canon would have an excellent camera and we would stop complaining... ;D
 
Upvote 0
tron said:
marekjoz said:
tron said:
81>79 No worries... ;D

With d900, when they reach their up scale limit, they will have to reevaluate all the numbers so it will fall down, most probably :)
Now you ruined my calculations :(
I was thinking: 3.5 years 2 point increase => 31.5 more years: 18 points increase which means 99!

So by the year 2044 Canon would have an excellent camera and we would stop complaining... ;D

I'm afraid that year after year it's more difficult to increase by a single point. But don't worry - no matter what silicon d900 will have it certainly would go beyond 100, so no chance for Canon. Sorry. ;)
 
Upvote 0
marekjoz said:
tron said:
marekjoz said:
tron said:
81>79 No worries... ;D

With d900, when they reach their up scale limit, they will have to reevaluate all the numbers so it will fall down, most probably :)
Now you ruined my calculations :(
I was thinking: 3.5 years 2 point increase => 31.5 more years: 18 points increase which means 99!

So by the year 2044 Canon would have an excellent camera and we would stop complaining... ;D

I'm afraid that year after year it's more difficult to increase by a single point. But don't worry - no matter what silicon d900 will have it certainly would go beyond 100, so no chance for Canon. Sorry. ;)

Wait till they really get good at growing diamond in labs. Diamond will replace silicon, and when that happens 100k iso will look like 100 iso. Diamond is the most conductive material known to man!
 
Upvote 0
Fishnose said:
marekjoz said:
tron said:
81>79 No worries... ;D

With d900, when they reach their up scale limit, they will have to reevaluate all the numbers so it will fall down, most probably :)

No, the DxO scale is not percentage based. It has no upper end so a camera can actually get a score of 103, etc.

Good news then. Great marketing gizmo - "the first sensor over 100" :)
 
Upvote 0
Tcapp said:
marekjoz said:
tron said:
marekjoz said:
tron said:
81>79 No worries... ;D

With d900, when they reach their up scale limit, they will have to reevaluate all the numbers so it will fall down, most probably :)
Now you ruined my calculations :(
I was thinking: 3.5 years 2 point increase => 31.5 more years: 18 points increase which means 99!

So by the year 2044 Canon would have an excellent camera and we would stop complaining... ;D

I'm afraid that year after year it's more difficult to increase by a single point. But don't worry - no matter what silicon d900 will have it certainly would go beyond 100, so no chance for Canon. Sorry. ;)

Wait till they really get good at growing diamond in labs. Diamond will replace silicon, and when that happens 100k iso will look like 100 iso. Diamond is the most conductive material known to man!

I thought they are semiconductors or insulators? Especially those clean.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.