rafaelsynths said:It is about the photographer not the camera.
I'd rather get the canon that fills all of my needs
rafaelsynths said:I'd rather get the canon that fills all of my needs
tron said:81>79 No worries... ;D
rafaelsynths said:It is about the photographer not the camera.
I'd rather get the canon that fills all of my needs
Now you ruined my calculationsmarekjoz said:tron said:81>79 No worries... ;D
With d900, when they reach their up scale limit, they will have to reevaluate all the numbers so it will fall down, most probably![]()
tron said:Now you ruined my calculationsmarekjoz said:tron said:81>79 No worries... ;D
With d900, when they reach their up scale limit, they will have to reevaluate all the numbers so it will fall down, most probably![]()
I was thinking: 3.5 years 2 point increase => 31.5 more years: 18 points increase which means 99!
So by the year 2044 Canon would have an excellent camera and we would stop complaining... ;D
marekjoz said:tron said:Now you ruined my calculationsmarekjoz said:tron said:81>79 No worries... ;D
With d900, when they reach their up scale limit, they will have to reevaluate all the numbers so it will fall down, most probably![]()
I was thinking: 3.5 years 2 point increase => 31.5 more years: 18 points increase which means 99!
So by the year 2044 Canon would have an excellent camera and we would stop complaining... ;D
I'm afraid that year after year it's more difficult to increase by a single point. But don't worry - no matter what silicon d900 will have it certainly would go beyond 100, so no chance for Canon. Sorry.![]()
marekjoz said:tron said:81>79 No worries... ;D
With d900, when they reach their up scale limit, they will have to reevaluate all the numbers so it will fall down, most probably![]()
Fishnose said:marekjoz said:tron said:81>79 No worries... ;D
With d900, when they reach their up scale limit, they will have to reevaluate all the numbers so it will fall down, most probably![]()
No, the DxO scale is not percentage based. It has no upper end so a camera can actually get a score of 103, etc.
Tcapp said:marekjoz said:tron said:Now you ruined my calculationsmarekjoz said:tron said:81>79 No worries... ;D
With d900, when they reach their up scale limit, they will have to reevaluate all the numbers so it will fall down, most probably![]()
I was thinking: 3.5 years 2 point increase => 31.5 more years: 18 points increase which means 99!
So by the year 2044 Canon would have an excellent camera and we would stop complaining... ;D
I'm afraid that year after year it's more difficult to increase by a single point. But don't worry - no matter what silicon d900 will have it certainly would go beyond 100, so no chance for Canon. Sorry.![]()
Wait till they really get good at growing diamond in labs. Diamond will replace silicon, and when that happens 100k iso will look like 100 iso. Diamond is the most conductive material known to man!