Good/Better/Best Macro for T3i
- Thread starter sanjosedave
- Start date
- Status
I certainly like my 100mm L on my 7d.
Truthfully though, if you are a deliberate and careful photographer, any of the macro lenses by Canon, Sigma, Tamron, tokina, Zeiss, etc are going to fall in the excellent range.
The reason I like the 100L is because I can get reasonably good results while handholding it, and I don't have the patience to do it properly.
Truthfully though, if you are a deliberate and careful photographer, any of the macro lenses by Canon, Sigma, Tamron, tokina, Zeiss, etc are going to fall in the excellent range.
The reason I like the 100L is because I can get reasonably good results while handholding it, and I don't have the patience to do it properly.
Upvote
0
Extra vote for the 100L here.
I'm using a 500D right now, and I must say the 100L is a really good walk around lens if you prefer snapping further than 50mm. IS helps keeping pictures steady and the bokeh is lovely. It also makes a pretty decent portraiture lens.
I'm using a 500D right now, and I must say the 100L is a really good walk around lens if you prefer snapping further than 50mm. IS helps keeping pictures steady and the bokeh is lovely. It also makes a pretty decent portraiture lens.
Upvote
0
... but since you weren't only asking for "the best" which is "the most expensive" most of the time: the older "golden ring" 100/2.8 macro is very cheap to get used and the sharpness is nearly up par with the more expensive version. If you really shoot macro objects you might be using a tripod anyway (i.e. IS won't help) and at very close distance IS doesn't help much or not at all. The one drawback of the non-L version is missing weather sealing, so you have to watch out for dust or sand.Joellll said:
Upvote
0
Some very good macro lenses for shooting flowers:
Canon 60/2.8
Sigma 70/2.8
Tamron 90/2.8 (I own this one, excellent lens)
Canon 100/2.8
Canon 100/2.8 L IS
All are exceedingly sharp and produce beautiful bokeh.
Think about secondary uses (e.g. portraiture) and how the lens would fit into your collection. Then pick a focal length accordingly.
Canon 60/2.8
Sigma 70/2.8
Tamron 90/2.8 (I own this one, excellent lens)
Canon 100/2.8
Canon 100/2.8 L IS
All are exceedingly sharp and produce beautiful bokeh.
Think about secondary uses (e.g. portraiture) and how the lens would fit into your collection. Then pick a focal length accordingly.
Upvote
0
I'm yet to hear of a bad macro lens. They are typically among the sharpest lenses of any manufacturer. I usually say that around 90-105mm is probably the best focal length for general purpose macro photography. It's basically an all round length. It gives you a bit of working distance (although more is better) if shooting insects, but isn't too long to make botanical macro work awkward, particularly in more confined spaces. However, if you are only intending to photograph flowers, then it's probably also worth considering a shorter focal length. For one thing they are less expensive, but also, some gardens aren't particularly large, so you may be limited on space. That's ok for 1:1 macro work, but if you need to back up to photograph a larger area, to produce a closeup, rather than a true macro, then you may find yourself running out of room with around 100mm. As AJ said, think about the areas you are likely to be photographing in and factor in any potential secondary uses.
Upvote
0
T
Tijn
Guest
Canon 100L, unless you're using a tripod for mostly all your shoots and you're short on cash. In that case, the Canon 100mm non-L (without IS) is almost as sharp as the L version. The difference in pictures will be indiscernible. If you're shooting hand-held, IS is recommended and then the 100L is just awesome.
Upvote
0
Bennymiata
Canon Rumors Premium
I have a 60d and also have the Canon 60mm macro, the 100L and the Sigma 150mm with OS.
As you can see, I like macro photography!
However, for flowers, I find the 60mm lens to be the best.
With the 100 and 150, you have to stand too far away for flowers.
Insects are a different matter however, and you need all the distance you can get, hence the 150mm Sigma.
The 60mm is very sharp with great colours and contrast, and the focussing is very fast too, in fact, it is so close the 100L in shaprness that it really doesn't matter.
Here'sa shot taken withthe 60mm macro for you.
The flower is about 1/2" diameter and is an Australian native called a muraya.
As you can see, I like macro photography!
However, for flowers, I find the 60mm lens to be the best.
With the 100 and 150, you have to stand too far away for flowers.
Insects are a different matter however, and you need all the distance you can get, hence the 150mm Sigma.
The 60mm is very sharp with great colours and contrast, and the focussing is very fast too, in fact, it is so close the 100L in shaprness that it really doesn't matter.
Here'sa shot taken withthe 60mm macro for you.
The flower is about 1/2" diameter and is an Australian native called a muraya.
Attachments
Upvote
0
A cheap entry level macro lens would be the 50/2.5 which is a 1:2 lens rather than the majority of the ones mentioned here which are 1:1.
To the OP original question
*All Canon*
Good = 50/2.5
Better = 100/2.8 or 60/2.8 EF-s
Best = 100/2.8 L
A buddy of mine has the Tamron 90 and says it is good.
To the OP original question
*All Canon*
Good = 50/2.5
Better = 100/2.8 or 60/2.8 EF-s
Best = 100/2.8 L
A buddy of mine has the Tamron 90 and says it is good.
Upvote
0
Jamesy said:
I was near buying the 50/2.5 just because it's magnification is lower as an addition to my 100mm. Then I tried it in a shop - the af is horrible 80s quality without manual override (I remember, I had Canon gear even back then) and the lens does not report focus distance which afaik sabotages the flash system.
Upvote
0
Jamesy said:
+1
I have the Canon 100mm f/2.8 USM macro, and it's very good. Sharp, great bokeh, etc. As I do nearly all my macro hand-held (and all my serious macro is hand-held) - I decided I didn't need the L and saved a couple hundred dollars that way. I also use my 100mm macro as a casual portrait lens too.
Paul
Upvote
0
- Status
Similar threads
