Have most now forsaken the 5dMk3 and jumped on to the Mk4?

scottkinfw

Wildlife photography is my passion
CR Pro
Hjalmarg1 said:
JonAustin said:
Another completely satisfied 5DIII owner here. In fact, I have a notification set up on canonpricewatch.com to get a message if/when new III's become available below $2K from an authorized dealer.

No doubt the 5DIV is an even better piece of gear, but I have no need for any higher resolution, nor video, nor touch screens. Wider DR and improved image quality are always welcome, but the III's capabilities rarely leave me wanting under the conditions I shoot.

I'm probably more of a candidate for the 6DII now than the 5DIV. In the meantime, I'll soldier on with my 5DIII, 5D and 20D (which is still a excellent body, and -- now that it's worth virtually $0 in the market -- a great "throwaway" camera when paired with an inexpensive prime, in hazardous (for camera gear) environments).
I'm very happy owner of my 5D3 and because I am a hobbiest, I am not planning to upgrade and spend $3K

For me, I wanted a IV for a trip. It was important that I get the best images (I'm not a pro). I had a 5D II and 5DIII. Long story short, the 1DXII came out in time, so I got it. I too all 3 bodies on the trip. Only problem is weight and bulk. Frankly two bodies were the main ones used, with the 1D ~ 90%.
Anyway, for me, I was intimidated by the 1D because of price and because I felt like a fraud! I found the 1DX easy to upgrade to, don't notice weight or size.
If the 5DIV came out first, I would have gotten it. In retrospect, that would not have been a good choice, as I am "growing into the camera" .
Sorry for rambling.
Scott
 
Upvote 0

ashmadux

Art Director, Visual Artist, Freelance Photography
Jul 28, 2011
583
146
New Yawk
photography.ashworld.com
Baba_HT said:
Am I the only one still Mk3 user? All I see on here now are threads regarding the Mk4.
To me the MK 3 is still an amazing camera. Maybe cause the 4k in the Mk4 sucks and I am not too fussy about touch screen. But that's me been me I guess.

I am very much still in love with my Mk3. I never leave home without her. ;D

What does "most" mean?

Anywho, you can try prying my 5d3 from my cold dead hands.

PS- 5d4 FEEEELS fantastic in the hands. Definitely an upgrade...but, for later later
 
Upvote 0
Feb 28, 2013
1,616
281
70
From a slightly different angle I was considering the 5D MKIV to replace my 6D and compliment my 5DS. Price not specification has put me off for now I cannot justify £ 3600 that it costs in the UK (after paying £ 2800 for the 5DS in 2015 & £ 1800 for the 100-400 L lens).

The colors I feel from the 5DS are an improvement over the 5D MKIII and the 6D and the resolution boost definitely is noticeable. The 5D MIV is a nice camera (we have one now at work), with IQ improvements over the MKIII and similar improved features that showed up in the 5DS and is definitely better in low light but I go back to the huge price bump from the MKIII.
 
Upvote 0
Jul 21, 2010
31,228
13,090
jeffa4444 said:
...but I go back to the huge price bump from the MKIII.

What is the at-launch price difference? In the US, the 5DIII and 5DIV launched at the same price (US$3499). Obviously, there's a significant difference if you compare the price of both at the time of the 5DIV launch, but the price of a four year old camera is not exactly an apples to apples comparison.
 
Upvote 0
Mar 25, 2011
16,847
1,835
Every new camera seems to drop in price when you consider inflation. Prices are not rising on new models (yet) to keep up with inflation or the higher value of the Yen.

I'm still waiting for prices to drop, but strongly considering adding a M5 as a second camera to my 5D MK III and selling my G1X II which has been good, but seems to struggle with getting even colors across the frame in poor light. This seems to happen more as sensors get smaller, my 5D MK III does much better when used side by side. I'
I've noticed the issue but never actually tried to do any definitive tests, and probably won't.

If a full frame replacement compact P&S comes out, it could easily replace my G1X as well.
 
Upvote 0
Dear friends,
from what i've seen in the reviews until now, i think i'm definitely not giving up my 5D3s for mk4! Especially when taking photos like this, became a piece of cake through practicing...i'll think about 1Dx Mk2.

Here's the link at flickr for those thinking to ditch their Mk3s in favor of Mk4...

https://www.flickr.com/photos/130851901@N05/30012638204/in/dateposted-public/
 

Attachments

  • Budapest - The Parliament at Night.jpg
    Budapest - The Parliament at Night.jpg
    2.1 MB · Views: 176
Upvote 0
Feb 15, 2015
667
10
CowGummy said:
Still happily shooting with a MkII myself.
That being said, the IV does look appealing after skipping a generation.

My first dSLR was the 5D2 (just converted to full spectrum), skipped 5D3, was eager to pick up a 5DsR, see no reason for a 5D4. Will wait to see whether a 5DsR2 is coming out, may pick that up, if it has features I want (GPS, easier focusing screen change).
 
Upvote 0
Jun 29, 2016
138
0
I have 2 mklll's, and as cameras are so good now I see little reason to upgrade unless I am specialising. The Mklll is a very very good general purpose camera, it does everything quite well. Were I looking to buy a new body, it would be to specialise, the small increase from a lll to a lV isn't worth it for me. Were I heavily into sport, I'd buy the 1DX mkll; were I heavily into landscapes, I'd buy the 5Ds; always keeping the Mklll as a walkabout camera.
I want something tangible to upgrade; super AF system and high frame rate for sport on the 1DX mkll, high MP for landscape with the 5Ds; if I can't tell the difference between 2 A3 prints, one with the Mklll and one the MklV....why would I upgrade to the MklV?
What I'm saying is, if you really need a better AF performance and higher frame rate than the Mklll, buy the 1DX mkll. If you need the high MP, do it in style with the 5Ds.
 
Upvote 0

Hector1970

CR Pro
Mar 22, 2012
1,554
1,162
I lost my 5DIII to the wild Atlantic Ocean so I was forced into the 5DIV.
My first imoressions is that it's no great improvement over the 5DIII.
Shadow recovery is slightly better. I don't find the focusing system much better.
Image quality is more or less the same.
The 5DIII I still believe is a great camera. Well worth buying if you are upgrading to full frame on a tight budget
The 5DIV is an incremental improvement.
There is no new wow with it. It's just slightly better.
I think myself a fully flippy screen would have been a major addition if they had added it.

As cameras both are good.
The 5D3 is probably better value for money
 
Upvote 0

ahsanford

Particular Member
Aug 16, 2012
8,620
1,651
Hector1970 said:
The 5D3 is probably better value for money

Understatement of the century. :D

Cameras can only make (generally) small advancements over time with current tech at this point, i.e. the days of 'it's 2 full stops better at high ISO' are clearly over. So the value proposition of a new rig is 'what glaring deficiencies in the last model have been corrected' or 'what new features were added that are gamechangers'.

From the 5D2 to 5D3, you got a world class AF upgrade (#1 reason to choose the 5D3 over the 5D2), two card slots, some fluffy in-camera HDR / dual exposure modes, some thoughtful video stuff (headphone jack) and a slightly better sensor (high ISO was better, but not dramatically so). +1 fps, larger buffer, etc. as well. But by any measure other than sensor quality, it was a comprehensive upgrade.

But the reason people jumped out of their seats for it was you could get a near 1D level AF experience at a 5D price point. It was, to many forms of photography, a flagship camera south of $7000. That was its biggest selling point, and it sold well.

Now from the 5D3 to 5D4, the problem lies in the fact that the 5D3 had only one clear 'weakness' (I giggle that people can't get good results with that sensor, but yes, it is outperformed by competitors in testing). So the 5D4 has less problems to fix than with the glaring AF deficiencies of the 5D2. So the 5D4 improvement/gamechanger is the sensor this time (and, for some, 4K) -- more resolution and on-chip ADC for more latitude with your files. If you shoot through the viewfinder, DPAF doesn't do anything for you. So the rest of the value proposition comes in predictable though important upgrades (VF layout, Wifi, GPS, anti-flicker mode, touch screen) or clever but lesser things (touch screen AF point selection, DP RAW).

Also consider that the FF lineup is much more crowded now, so it's harder for the 5D4 to justify its existence in the light of quality of the 6D brand (which has many folks waiting-and-seeing for what the 6D2 brings to the table before buying a 5D4) and great resolving power of the 5DS rigs.

So I think the 5D4 was one key feature away from being a blockbuster. Either give it the processing bandwidth of a 5DS and give it 9 fps or so, or give it a tilty-flippy screen. Both of those unlock some sexy 'new' into the brand in a way that (I think) would have a lot more people getting in on day one rather than waiting for what the 6D2 might bring.

- A
 
Upvote 0