R
randplaty
Guest
crunchy said:I'm still baffled by the people who are constantly prattling on about how the low-MP sensor means better DR and high ISO compared to the (less expensive) D800.
Have those people even seen the D800 sample images?
I so want the 5DIII to have amazing DR and high ISO (in raw, not some jpeg noise reduction hell) but I wouldn't call it just yet.
Bring on the reviews, comparisons etc.
And a RAW file or two wouldn't hurt.
http://blog.jeffascough.com/photographers/2012/03/canon-eos-5d-mark-iii-review.html
He says its 2 stops better than the mk2 and he shoots RAW. There are a couple images up too. He says the DR is better. People are saying it's better, it's just whether or not you trust them.
The D800 is supposed to be on par with the D700 but not better.
Upvote
0