Upvote
0
How long are you willing to wait?Pretty sure my next body is gonna be a Pro RF. This raises a mild interest for EF again.
Is there anything inherently different or technically insurmountable about an IBIS on DSLR versus IBIS on a mirrorless camera? It seems that everyone who builds a mirrorless camera have figured out how to get it up and running a decade ago, while the DSLR giants are still trying to figure it out. Can anyone who understand that stuff shed some light as to why DSLR IBIS has lagged that far behind?
Count me as a skeptic. Whatever Canon does decide to do, it is usually top notch, so if this shows up in the 1D line, I will be excited. But they also tend to release new tech on lower end models first and whatever makes to the 1Dx is proven/bulletproof. Example, DPAF came in first on the 70D, I believe.
If IBIS was coming to the 1D line, I would have thought we would have seen in on the M6II or 90D.
As has already been pointed out that is not how Canon normally work, they put new tech in lower end models to evaluate over high numbers the acceptance rate, things like eye controlled AF never made it to the 1 series after being introduced in the EOS3.With the high price tag this camera will undoubtedly have it would reflect very poorly on Canon not to have all the latest and greatest technology included. But this is Canon so...
Plus, think of the timelines.....As has already been pointed out that is not how Canon normally work, they put new tech in lower end models to evaluate over high numbers the acceptance rate, things like eye controlled AF never made it to the 1 series after being introduced in the EOS3.
all future Canon ILC cameras will have the feature as well.
(M5 Mk ll)Maybe another lower end camera is coming out.
None. Zilch. But I shoot more than just fast moving subjects. IBIS is really welcome for meI do not have body with IBIS, and having limited knowledge for IBIS.
But I’m wondering how much benefits of IBIS to sports shooter, while catching the moment normally need higher shutter speed.
They also have the movie IBIS in the 6D Mk II. Can't remember if the 5D Mk IV has that feature...I'm wondering if it would be more of a video focused Electronic IBIS similar to what it being used on the new C500 Mark II. This could be added to "any" ILC without significant hardware issues...as floating sensor IBIS has normally been limited to mirrorless systems. There are people arguing that this electronic IBIS can actually be more accurate, especially when combined with lens IS, as the gyro information being used is "actual" rather than predictive. Don't know if that's completely true, (electronic stabilization benefits from higher shutter speeds, which negates its usefulness in still shooting), but certainly, the computational side is the direction that most manufacturers are starting to look at.
The DSLR giants might be struggling with implementing in DSLRs but Pentax (Ricoh) has it figured out; I don't know if they collaborated with Sony, Panasonic, or Olympus though.Is there anything inherently different or technically insurmountable about an IBIS on DSLR versus IBIS on a mirrorless camera? It seems that everyone who builds a mirrorless camera have figured out how to get it up and running a decade ago, while the DSLR giants are still trying to figure it out. Can anyone who understand that stuff shed some light as to why DSLR IBIS has lagged that far behind?