Just got my 5DIII, should i keep 60D?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dave of Finland
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
D

Dave of Finland

Guest
I just spent my first night taking photos with my new 5D III. I don't care what anyone says, it's a wonderful camera. Specifically, i'm loving the silent shutter and the high iso performance. Those features plus the build quality are a huge improvement over my 60D.

That noted, i'm thinking that even though i'm not a pro photographer it might make sense for me to keep my 60D. For what i would get for selling it i think i'm better off using it to extend the range on my 70-200 2.8 ii.

In other words, won't i get better results with the 60D at 200mm than i would with the 5diii and a teleconverter (which i would have to buy if i sold the 60D)? If it's even close, i'd obviously prefer to have the flexibility of a backup camera and the fold out LCD for video.

Thanks in advance for your feedback.
 
I agree with the others, I say keep it as a backup unless you need the money. I actually bought a 60D a bit ago as a planned backup to an eventual 5DmkIII purchase, since they have the same battery and my T2i has been acting up. Plus the added reach may sometimes come in handy.
 
Upvote 0
I also went from 60D to 5Dm3 and I'm going to have my 60D converted to full-spectrum to fiddle with - then I can do IR, H-alpha for astro, and even put a uv/ir block on to revert it to visible light.
 
Upvote 0
I did something similar with an old 20D, converting it to IR.

I’m a proponent of having a back-up camera. The combination of FF and APS-C bodies will give you greater range with your lenses. Don’t forget that the Canon extenders don’t work with every Canon L lens. If you can turn the 60D into a lens that you wouldn’t be able to acquire otherwise, that might merit consideration, but I wouldn’t trade a 60D for an extender plus a little cash.
 
Upvote 0
I don't have a 60D but I'll be keeping my 50D when I get my 5Diii. Here's why: I like the crop factor for wildlife/bird photos, I also prefer it for macro to my FF - a) because the subject appears closer, b) because in macro the larger DOF is an advantage.
 
Upvote 0
Keep your 60D.

Same strategy here but delayed. I've got a 7D and I'm planning to add a 5D3 hopefully in about a year . I'll have my sports-wildlife setup plus landscape-portrait-low light setup; best of both world.

I always had 2 bodies in the film days for multiple ISO and I want two bodies today for the reasons listed above.
 
Upvote 0
If you are not a professional photographer, and have no reason to use two cameras simultaneously, or have no critical reason to keep the 60D as an emergency backup (IE, expensive paying client!) Then I would totally suggest you sell that camera and pickup another nice lens for your 5DIII!!! Really I think this might be the way for you if your not actively shooting professionally. Investing in good L series glass is a better investment in the long run than holding onto a body you will rarely use. The only reason some of us professional photographers keep extra camera bodies is in the event of a camera emergency. Ive had cameras go down on me before. Rather than troubleshoot, I grab a backup body and worry about it later.

Ive got 2x5D3's, a 5D2, 7D, and even a 40D crammed in the back of my camera bag somewhere. The 5D2's and 7D are video cameras, the 5D3's my primary cameras. I always carry 2 bodies with different lenses for wedding photography.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.