tpatana said:
I was wondering same thing few days ago. Most likely they'll keep 5D4 quite safe until last minute so it doesn't impact 1DX2 sales. Like for me, this month there's event I'd love to carry 2 bodies. I already sold my second one to make room for next one, but until I know more about 5D4 I can't decide. If it turns out to be really bad, I'll just get 1DX2. If 5D4 is as good as I hope it to be, I'll certainly get that instead.
I doubt the 5D4 will best the 1DX2 on anything regarding the sensor with the sole exception of higher resolution. And even that will be completely negated by superior IQ of the 1DX2 after raising the ISO past a certain point. This was precisely the case between the 1DX and the 5D3. By ISO 400, the 1DX put out better overall IQ than the 5D3. Only at ISO 100 and 200 did the 5D3 arguably look better due to the slight megapixel advantage.
Thus, if one is not impressed by the 1DX2 sensor performance, my suggestion is to not put too much hope in the 5D4. It will not be better. At best, maybe, just maybe - the DR performance might be a little tiny bit better at low ISO but will sacrifice it more at higher ISO compared to the 1DX2. All depends how they 'tune' this sensor.
My guess is that the 6D2 or whatever next FF comes next year will be in some ways close to or equal to the 1DX2 due to advancements made. Exactly the same scenario as how the 6D had a better sensor than the 5D3, and the 6D came close to the 1DX. Although, not without being a significantly weaker camera in all other aspects.
Making the 5D4 too good can hurt 1D series sales. The above user's post is evidence of just that.
This means that the 5D4 will remain noticeably behind other brand competitors in this range of semi-pro/pro camera. A clear indication that Canon would rather protect high end pro sales than prevent defectors of mid-range pro camera users to Nikon.
Makes sense. I'd rather ensure I keep people buying $6000 cameras than those buying $3000 cameras. Because a lot of those 1D series guys are also running nothing but top-end L glass. And the sports shooters, super high dollar telephotos.
The 5D level shooters hammering out weddings every week could care less for an extra stop of DR or anything else that DXO or DPR cares about. They need a workhorse to crank out images. Canon is a better system for that.
In the end, Canon is bleeding out the techies. Those who care more about small tech differences than making money or creating serious art. These tech enthusiasts who are photo enthusiasts second, most of them have already gone to Nikon/Sony in the last 4 years. Not many disappointed Canon users left who are hoping and holding out for Sony-like sensor performance.
Canon keeps moving forward with the agenda to satisfy serious photography needs. Not DXO and DPR.