• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

Lens issues; what replacement options do I have?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Aug 20, 2012
223
0
6,351
So a while ago I bought a sigma 24-60 2.8, for about £150. It's never been hugely sharp, but it let me down massively at a wedding recently. I ran it through a moire based AF test and it's all over the place.
Long story short, it doesn't focus consistently across the zoom (not so much a problem) nor consistently when you are closer/further away from a subject. That's a huge problem; I can't ask everything I take pictures of to stand at exactly 3.5m and hope for the best.

Anyways, I'm looking for a replacement. With this lens and a couple of other cheapies, I can get about £200 trade in and can save a little money to go towards something else.
I've got a 7D, and I've found the 24 to be a little too zoomed for me, but I love the 2.8

Locally, one of my camera shops is selling a 17-40L for £449, and that seems like the best option to me. It's nice and wide and the L glass is always good.

I was wondering if anyone had any good suggestions? I'm not adverse to third party options but if possible I'd like to avoid Sigma.
Thanks,
Elliot
 
The 17-40L was the first lens I purchased together with my 10D back in '04, and it has been part of my kit since then (I have a 50D now, expecting delivery of a 5D3 RSN) and have no plans of replacing it. I've been very happy with it, and for the first 4 years when I had the 17-40 and a 70-200/4L (non-IS) 80%+ of my shots were with the 17-40L. After getting my hands on a 24-70L, it has been relegated to a more classic WA role.
 
Upvote 0
Menace said:
Remember 17-40L is f4 so If you like 2.8 why not look into EFs 17-55 2.8 - it may not by L but the IQ is superb. Pair it with your 7d and you'll have a great combination.

It's a bit pricy though: http://www.jessops.com/online.store/products/35293/show.html

Also, why not rent both for the week end and see which one you like :)

Cheers
Thanks for the replies guys! I'm on a really right budget at the moment, so can't afford the 2.8, sadly. I'm also looking to go FF whenever I can, so I'm trying to avoid efs lenses, as much as it's a beautiful lens.
Is the weather sealing on the 17 40 any good?
 
Upvote 0
My buddy has a 17-40 and he is pretty harsh with it. The color saturation is great, its rugged, and contrasty. He says the weather sealing is great. When I was looking at lenses these were too expensive. I bought a sigma 17-70 2.8-4 OS and kinda wish i got the 17-40L. I do like the IS on my lens, and it is a stop faster on the wide end, and I have alot of fun with it at 17mm with IS on at night. You can get sharp 1/4 second shots. The 17-70 seems to be hit and miss with autofocus being front-focused, but your 7d has AFMA so that is probably not an issue for you.
 
Upvote 0
Ryan708 said:
My buddy has a 17-40 and he is pretty harsh with it. The color saturation is great, its rugged, and contrasty. He says the weather sealing is great. When I was looking at lenses these were too expensive. I bought a sigma 17-70 2.8-4 OS and kinda wish i got the 17-40L. I do like the IS on my lens, and it is a stop faster on the wide end, and I have alot of fun with it at 17mm with IS on at night. You can get sharp 1/4 second shots. The 17-70 seems to be hit and miss with autofocus being front-focused, but your 7d has AFMA so that is probably not an issue for you.

That sounds great. The build quality and contrast sounds more useful to me than is really, I use flash a tonne so that'll cover the lack of 2.8. 17_40l it is, thank you all for your posts
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.