Letter to Mr Rockwell in regards to his 5Dmkiii review

Status
Not open for further replies.
V8Beast said:
Ken Rockwell's images aren't overly saturated; he just sees the world more vividly than anyone else.

No, it's the other way around. He has to crank up the saturation because that's the only way he can get anything out of any subject. Without 'Vivid' his photos would all be grey & beige picnic tables and his own horrible, colorless kids.


And remember folks! Tripods are for wimps! (Says KR, and he knows)
 
Upvote 0
V8Beast said:
Fishnose said:
Without 'Vivid' his photos would all be grey & beige picnic tables and his own horrible, colorless kids.

Easy there. I don't like Ken's ramblings any more than the next guy, but let's leave his kids out of it. Isn't it enough that they're going to be raised by this guy? That alone is unfortunate enough.

Shezz

You just had to mention the kids. :(
Now the bashing is loosing momentum. :'(
 
Upvote 0
So now that we all know kids are not to be mentioned, lets get back on track people.

Google doesn't lie.
kenrockwell.jpg
 
Upvote 0
D_Rochat said:
This is in the spirit of the Dos Equis guy and fitting for this thread.

Right on, commander :-p - but it is doubtful if this ensures that the Canon community is not confused with fanboyz. Since I haven't that much of a problem with his site: it'll be interesting if he corrects mistaken facts after all. However, some things like "I can't see my subject under the ugly black AF-area squares" are just personal opinions that cannot argued about, and might be even valid opinions to people using a Canon...
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.