briansquibb said:mh1973 said:At this week, Canon has provided workaround for reparation. However, they roughly announced serial number of flawed product at the same time. Obviously, Canon has no consideration of first users. Also, it indirectly hit and hurt first users again. it caused that first user will lose good price of 5D3 at 2nd hand market in the future once they would like to sell. Becuase all buyers know serial number is a flaw ones... Even if it has been repaired... buyer also are concern about disassembled body. Canon should handle this affair more carefully. Because most of first users are loyal and believe Canon's product. Unquestionably, Canon will lose goodwill if no good repairation for first users.![]()
Yep the whiners publically whined long and loud about a glitch that shouldn't affect them and it has hit them in the pocket, hit millions of happy users in the pocket and tarnished the reputation of a fine camera
I hope they are pleased with themselves and will be able to sleep soundly knowing they have achieved a 'result' by 'forcing' Canon to rectify a minor problem that would never have impacted them![]()
"hit millions of happy users"
you don't really think that there are that many people with 5D Mark III's do you?
Upvote
0