• UPDATE



    The forum will be moving to a new domain in the near future (canonrumorsforum.com). I have turned off "read-only", but I will only leave the two forum nodes you see active for the time being.

    I don't know at this time how quickly the change will happen, but that will move at a good pace I am sure.

    ------------------------------------------------------------

Milky Way

@kypr.eos yep tracking is the way to go if the location allows you to set it up. I use it even with my Sigma 14mm f/1.8. Upping the ISO is just not the same (and I am not talking about noise).
For sure. Btw, lately I’ve been practicing polar alignment without having a direct view of polaris. I transfer the latitude of my location to the wedge and use the iPhone’s “True North” feature in the Compass app to point north. I found the technique to be working quite well; it’s certainly not as accurate as standard polar alignment, but I could still get approximately 110-second exposures with the Samyang 14mm 2.8, which is still better than nothing. Alyn Wallace has a video describing a few more techniques when polaris is out of sight, in case you are interested.
 
Upvote 0
Playing around with stacking on the R5. here are two shots. During the second exposure a car drove through.0T7A2346 small.jpeg

0T7A2346 Headlight small.jpeg
Since there are so many ways to bring out details, I have a feeling I might have gone overboard. These don't seem that milky.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Upvote 0