Really not sure what you and skyscraper are babbling about. Good lord.the 5div is 30mp, and the 1dxmkii is 20mp. So it is 66% of the megapixels of the 5d, exactly what I was saying. Not sure what you are talking about.
Upvote
0
Really not sure what you and skyscraper are babbling about. Good lord.the 5div is 30mp, and the 1dxmkii is 20mp. So it is 66% of the megapixels of the 5d, exactly what I was saying. Not sure what you are talking about.
The 5D S and 5D S R were released in mid-2015 and are still in the catalog.Compare apples with apples, compare the 1dxiii with the 5div, or the 1dxii with the 5diii. Compare a similar generation of cameras
Compare apples with apples, compare the 1dxiii with the 5div, or the 1dxii with the 5diii. Compare a similar generation of cameras
I mispoke, compare the 1dxii to 5dmiv. It has the exact ratio of pixels as I was referring to. The 1dx has 66% of the mp as the 5dThe 5D S and 5D S R were released in mid-2015 and are still in the catalog.
The 1D X Mark II was released in early 2016 and replaced in 2020.
They are the same generation of camera.
First you say Canon has not historically marketed different cameras to different types of users.
Now you're saying we can't compare the 5Ds series to the 1D X series model that sold at the same time (1D X Mark II) because they were aimed at different users than the 5D Mark IV which also are the same generation?
You can't compare the R5 to the 1Dx, they are a completely different generation of camera. The R3 and R1 will be the same generation as the R5The 1D X was introduced in 2012, the same year as the 5D Mark III. They're the same generation of camera.
The 5Ds and 5Ds R were introduced in 2015.
The 1D X Mark II and 5D Mark IV were introduced in 2016, but the 5D Mark IV was not a replacement for the 5Ds and 5Ds R. Both are still in Canon's current catalog. The 1D X Mark II, 5D Mark IV, and 5Ds/5Ds R are the same generation of camera.
The R5 and the 1D X Mark III were both introduced in 2020. They're the same generation offered at the same time.
"compare the 1dxiii with the 5div" - the 1D X Mark III was introduced in 2020, four years after the 5D Mark IV in 2016.
"or the 1dxii with the 5diii" - The 1D X Mark II was introduced in 2016, four years after the 5D Mark III in 2012.
As you can clearly see, the trend had been to increase the difference between the 5-Series and the 1-Series with every product cycle.
In 2012 the current 5-Series had 1.33X as many pixels as the 1-Series.
in 2016 the three current 5-Series models had 1.5X and 2.5X, respectively, as many pixels as the 1-Series.
In 2020 the current 5-Series model has 2.25X as many pixels as the current 1-Series camera, with rumors swirling of an impending high resolution R5s by the end of 2021.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Canon_EOS_digital_cameras
as per https://www.canonrumors.com/forum/t...e-canon-eos-r3-have-emerged.40492/post-895269 I believe that @Skyscraperfan does understand the difference but places higher emphasis on psychological aspects than on technological ones.Because he doesn't understand that 100% magnification is not the same enlargement ratio for a high MP image as it is for a low MP image. When you enlarge a smaller image pixel to the size of a screen pixel, you're magnifying more than when you enlarge a larger image pixel to the same sized screen pixel.
Some folks apparently can't wrap their mind around the fact that they're looking at a 36x24 inch enlargement when viewing 8.2MP images on a 24" FHD monitor with a pixel pitch of 96 ppi, and they're looking at an 85x57 enlargement when they're viewing a 45MP image at 100% on the same monitor.
Interesting but these are amateurs too so the pro sports shooters are very out numbered.Here in the U.S., I'd think that amateur sports photographers outnumber amateur birders by at least 10:1, probably more like 20:1. There are handfuls of them on the sidelines at every high school football game, which is by far the biggest amateur sport in the U.S. (college sports are not "amateur", no matter what the NCAA claims). Baseball/softball and soccer have their share, too.
You're right, I didn't mean that scientifically. I just meant the visual perception of the post-processed image. But that's already an accident for me, I still shoot sometimes positive (slide) film, which forces me back to the old rules of careful metering anyway.You're not really recovering anything. You're just extending the white point all the way to 16,383 instead of cutting it off at around 4,095 like the camera's JPEG engine that generates the preview image is doing it.
I think you mean DCI 4K which is why R5 is 45 MP.UHD 8K is 16:9. Extend that width to a 3:2 sensor and you have 44-45 MP.
I do not think that is a fair comparison since the 1 DX Mark III was released before the R5.In 2020 Canon released the 45 MP R5 which they specifically market as the replacement for the 5D Mark IV. It's a 5-Series camera.
In 2020 Canon released the 20 MP 1D X Mark III, which is a 1-Series camera.
The 1D X Mark III has 44% as many pixels as the R5.
For that matter, the 2016 20 MP 1D X Mark II only has 40% as many pixels as the 2015 50 MP 5Ds and 5Ds R...
Who says the buffer will get full?30fps until the buffer is full. Then you're at ever how many frames clear the buffer per second. If the buffer is sending data to both the CFexpress bus and the SD card bus at the SD card speed, it will take significantly longer to clear the buffer of the same amount of data than when the CFexpress bus is operating at its higher speed.
Hmmm if they are released within the same year they are generally considered to be of the same generation. Further proof is that a camera released at the same time as the R5, the R6 also uses the 1DX iii sensor. In my opinion it is very reasonable to compare them…I do not think that is a fair comparison since the 1 DX Mark III was released before the R5.
However, that should have bearing on the R1, not the R3.
the 1DX iii is basically just an enhanced version of the 1Dx2, the R5 is not just an enhanced version of the 5D, it is a completely different generation of camera. Hence the new naming convention for this generation of cameras.Hmmm if they are released within the same year they are generally considered to be of the same generation. Further proof is that a camera released at the same time as the R5, the R6 also uses the 1DX iii sensor. In my opinion it is very reasonable to compare
I understand what you mean. Of course a 45MP image is larger that an 8.2MP image at 100%, but a pixel still is a pixel. It only is larger because you have more of those pixels. Just look at the 108 megapixel photos that many smartphone cameras can now produce. Then you understand the problems I have with many pixels. The main advantage of a full frame camera for me are the larger pixels on the sensor. With a high resolution you bascically throw away that big advantage.Because he doesn't understand that 100% magnification is not the same enlargement ratio for a high MP image as it is for a low MP image. When you enlarge a smaller image pixel to the size of a screen pixel, you're magnifying more than when you enlarge a larger image pixel to the same sized screen pixel.
Some folks apparently can't wrap their mind around the fact that they're looking at a 36x24 inch enlargement when viewing 8.2MP images on a 24" FHD monitor with a pixel pitch of 96 ppi, and they're looking at an 85x57 enlargement when they're viewing a 45MP image at 100% on the same monitor.
I get where you’re coming from. But of course the difference between 5D and R5 is more dramatic because it is the first 5 series mirrorless - they had to flex their muscles given the relative performance of other mirrorless cameras.the 1DX iii is basically just an enhanced version of the 1Dx2, the R5 is not just an enhanced version of the 5D, it is a completely different generation of camera. Hence the new naming convention for this generation of cameras.
You can't compare the R5 to the 1Dx, they are a completely different generation of camera. The R3 and R1 will be the same generation as the R5
I mispoke, compare the 1dxii to 5dmiv. It has the exact ratio of pixels as I was referring to. The 1dx has 66% of the mp as the 5d
Who says the buffer will get full?
This is not Sony we are talking about.
I get that this s not the R1 but Canon is going hard at 30 FPS.
If there is any kind of limit reached then even I will call BS on them.
The usual cabal of YouTube critics is just waiting for Canon to screw up.
the 1DX iii is basically just an enhanced version of the 1Dx2, the R5 is not just an enhanced version of the 5D, it is a completely different generation of camera. Hence the new naming convention for this generation of cameras.
I understand what you mean. Of course a 45MP image is larger that an 8.2MP image at 100%, but a pixel still is a pixel. It only is larger because you have more of those pixels. Just look at the 108 megapixel photos that many smartphone cameras can now produce. Then you understand the problems I have with many pixels. The main advantage of a full frame camera for me are the larger pixels on the sensor. With a high resolution you bascically throw away that big advantage.
8K video has the same problems. 4K already is enough for quite a large screen. 8K just needs more drive space in most situations.