My New "L"

Started with 70-200 f/4 L IS, then got 400 f/5.6L no-IS, then got 180 f/3.5L no-IS 1:1 macro. I get more use out of the two primes. I shoot close-ups with that macro hand held, usually at high speed, often with a 1.4x TC II attached. It provides some comfort zone for the critter (eg cottonmouth or timber rattler) and for me! The blur of the 180 macro is worth the extra money and heaviness.
 
Upvote 0
Congratulations on the new addition!

My first "L" was somewhat underwhelming, nothing like yours. I bought a 100-400L used and it was a poor copy, not very sharp and required AFMA of -19 on the wide end and +11 on the other. I sold it and purchased a new 70-200 2.8 II followed shortly by a 35L. I've done some buying and selling of other L's along the way, but the 70-200 has a permanent home in my kit.
 
Upvote 0
NancyP said:
Started with 70-200 f/4 L IS, then got 400 f/5.6L no-IS, then got 180 f/3.5L no-IS 1:1 macro. I get more use out of the two primes. I shoot close-ups with that macro hand held, usually at high speed, often with a 1.4x TC II attached. It provides some comfort zone for the critter (eg cottonmouth or timber rattler) and for me! The blur of the 180 macro is worth the extra money and heaviness.

I shouldn't have read this. I'm still enjoying the honeymoon period of my 70-200 F4L IS. You mean there could be lenses I'm going to want and use even more??? ;) :P
 
Upvote 0
Joey said:
You shoot crop, so the 60mm will double as a very good portrait lens while the 100mm will be a bit long for many portrait purposes.

Can I encourage you to focus your L envy at a different L? I think you'll get more benefit...!

Hi Joey - thanks for your response. I have both crop and FF camera's and I would like a macro to fit my 5D. I have no problems with the 60mm macro, it is a fine lens and has produced some awesome pictures, but I don't see the need to keep both lenses when I would have one lens that will work with both cameras. I've attached one of my favorite pictures using the 60 macro. The exposure is a tad dark, but the butterfly had just hatched and was posing perfect on my daughter's finger for a hand held shot. It's amazing just how furry butterflies are. :)

-wes
 

Attachments

  • Painted Lady Butterfly (6 of 18).JPG
    Painted Lady Butterfly (6 of 18).JPG
    749.2 KB · Views: 143
Upvote 0
Greatland said:
I have both the 24-105, which is one of my 'go to' lenses as well as the new 100 Macro...both very fine lenses and worth every penny of their cost.....now you need the 70-200 and a 1.4 extender

Hi Greatland. Thanks for the advice and I do have a 70-200 F2.8 Mk II with the 1.4 extender III. That lens and teleconverter have been my go to combo for all of the sports shooting I do. It's perfect for little league baseball :) Actually, I haven't found anything the 70-200 isn't perfect for!
 
Upvote 0
The 24-105 was my first "L" and glad to say I still have it and use it (although it's now a different copy). Very versatile on the 5D3, and it was also nice on the T2i I originally bought it for.
 
Upvote 0
wsmith96 said:
Joey said:
You shoot crop, so the 60mm will double as a very good portrait lens while the 100mm will be a bit long for many portrait purposes.

Can I encourage you to focus your L envy at a different L? I think you'll get more benefit...!

Hi Joey - thanks for your response. I have both crop and FF camera's and I would like a macro to fit my 5D. I have no problems with the 60mm macro, it is a fine lens and has produced some awesome pictures, but I don't see the need to keep both lenses when I would have one lens that will work with both cameras. I've attached one of my favorite pictures using the 60 macro. The exposure is a tad dark, but the butterfly had just hatched and was posing perfect on my daughter's finger for a hand held shot. It's amazing just how furry butterflies are. :)

-wes
Beautiful pic, thanks for posting it!
 
Upvote 0
timothetoad said:
So awesome!

I got my first L lens the same day as you! Bought a refurbished 16-35 f/4L IS for my 6D. In love with the semi distorted ultra wide angle look. So far, so good.

The more I use this lens the more it's value is apparent. It renders colors and contrast very well. Much improved over the 17-40 or 16-35 Mk2.
 
Upvote 0
wsmith96 said:
Joey said:
You shoot crop, so the 60mm will double as a very good portrait lens while the 100mm will be a bit long for many portrait purposes.

Can I encourage you to focus your L envy at a different L? I think you'll get more benefit...!

Hi Joey - thanks for your response. I have both crop and FF camera's and I would like a macro to fit my 5D. I have no problems with the 60mm macro, it is a fine lens and has produced some awesome pictures, but I don't see the need to keep both lenses when I would have one lens that will work with both cameras. I've attached one of my favorite pictures using the 60 macro. The exposure is a tad dark, but the butterfly had just hatched and was posing perfect on my daughter's finger for a hand held shot. It's amazing just how furry butterflies are. :)

-wes

Do you know that you can use EF-S 60/2.8 Macro on your 5D with EF 12 II Extension Tube, or similar third party alternatives? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAr9FfFxlqo
 
Upvote 0