• The Canon Rumors Forum has officially been shut down as of July 10, 2026.

    All data will be deleted on September 16, 2026.

    the ad free experience will return by July 17, 2026.

My New "L"

Started with 70-200 f/4 L IS, then got 400 f/5.6L no-IS, then got 180 f/3.5L no-IS 1:1 macro. I get more use out of the two primes. I shoot close-ups with that macro hand held, usually at high speed, often with a 1.4x TC II attached. It provides some comfort zone for the critter (eg cottonmouth or timber rattler) and for me! The blur of the 180 macro is worth the extra money and heaviness.
 
Upvote 0
Congratulations on the new addition!

My first "L" was somewhat underwhelming, nothing like yours. I bought a 100-400L used and it was a poor copy, not very sharp and required AFMA of -19 on the wide end and +11 on the other. I sold it and purchased a new 70-200 2.8 II followed shortly by a 35L. I've done some buying and selling of other L's along the way, but the 70-200 has a permanent home in my kit.
 
Upvote 0
NancyP said:
Started with 70-200 f/4 L IS, then got 400 f/5.6L no-IS, then got 180 f/3.5L no-IS 1:1 macro. I get more use out of the two primes. I shoot close-ups with that macro hand held, usually at high speed, often with a 1.4x TC II attached. It provides some comfort zone for the critter (eg cottonmouth or timber rattler) and for me! The blur of the 180 macro is worth the extra money and heaviness.

I shouldn't have read this. I'm still enjoying the honeymoon period of my 70-200 F4L IS. You mean there could be lenses I'm going to want and use even more??? ;) :P
 
Upvote 0
Joey said:
You shoot crop, so the 60mm will double as a very good portrait lens while the 100mm will be a bit long for many portrait purposes.

Can I encourage you to focus your L envy at a different L? I think you'll get more benefit...!

Hi Joey - thanks for your response. I have both crop and FF camera's and I would like a macro to fit my 5D. I have no problems with the 60mm macro, it is a fine lens and has produced some awesome pictures, but I don't see the need to keep both lenses when I would have one lens that will work with both cameras. I've attached one of my favorite pictures using the 60 macro. The exposure is a tad dark, but the butterfly had just hatched and was posing perfect on my daughter's finger for a hand held shot. It's amazing just how furry butterflies are. :)

-wes
 

Attachments

  • Painted Lady Butterfly (6 of 18).JPG
    Painted Lady Butterfly (6 of 18).JPG
    749.2 KB · Views: 143
Upvote 0
Greatland said:
I have both the 24-105, which is one of my 'go to' lenses as well as the new 100 Macro...both very fine lenses and worth every penny of their cost.....now you need the 70-200 and a 1.4 extender

Hi Greatland. Thanks for the advice and I do have a 70-200 F2.8 Mk II with the 1.4 extender III. That lens and teleconverter have been my go to combo for all of the sports shooting I do. It's perfect for little league baseball :) Actually, I haven't found anything the 70-200 isn't perfect for!
 
Upvote 0
The 24-105 was my first "L" and glad to say I still have it and use it (although it's now a different copy). Very versatile on the 5D3, and it was also nice on the T2i I originally bought it for.
 
Upvote 0
wsmith96 said:
Joey said:
You shoot crop, so the 60mm will double as a very good portrait lens while the 100mm will be a bit long for many portrait purposes.

Can I encourage you to focus your L envy at a different L? I think you'll get more benefit...!

Hi Joey - thanks for your response. I have both crop and FF camera's and I would like a macro to fit my 5D. I have no problems with the 60mm macro, it is a fine lens and has produced some awesome pictures, but I don't see the need to keep both lenses when I would have one lens that will work with both cameras. I've attached one of my favorite pictures using the 60 macro. The exposure is a tad dark, but the butterfly had just hatched and was posing perfect on my daughter's finger for a hand held shot. It's amazing just how furry butterflies are. :)

-wes
Beautiful pic, thanks for posting it!
 
Upvote 0
timothetoad said:
So awesome!

I got my first L lens the same day as you! Bought a refurbished 16-35 f/4L IS for my 6D. In love with the semi distorted ultra wide angle look. So far, so good.

The more I use this lens the more it's value is apparent. It renders colors and contrast very well. Much improved over the 17-40 or 16-35 Mk2.
 
Upvote 0
wsmith96 said:
Joey said:
You shoot crop, so the 60mm will double as a very good portrait lens while the 100mm will be a bit long for many portrait purposes.

Can I encourage you to focus your L envy at a different L? I think you'll get more benefit...!

Hi Joey - thanks for your response. I have both crop and FF camera's and I would like a macro to fit my 5D. I have no problems with the 60mm macro, it is a fine lens and has produced some awesome pictures, but I don't see the need to keep both lenses when I would have one lens that will work with both cameras. I've attached one of my favorite pictures using the 60 macro. The exposure is a tad dark, but the butterfly had just hatched and was posing perfect on my daughter's finger for a hand held shot. It's amazing just how furry butterflies are. :)

-wes

Do you know that you can use EF-S 60/2.8 Macro on your 5D with EF 12 II Extension Tube, or similar third party alternatives? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAr9FfFxlqo
 
Upvote 0