Need filter suggestions - Ordered Canon 100mm f2.8 L macro

[leftnose]

B&W Kaesemann Circular Polarizer's

Just as an FWIW, I've been told that the MRC Kaesemann circular polarizers are optically identical to the standard MRC circular polarizers. The difference is the construction. The Kaesemann filters are simply sealed around the edge to protect the polarizing foil against humidity and other environmental conditions.

So, if you live in and never leave the desert, a standard MRC polarizer might be money better spent.

At least, that's what I've been told.

 

[crasher8]

I put a B/W clear mrc filter on my 100 Macro. Why? I shoot 1-4 inches from my subjects occasionally getting poked and scraped by branches and twigs and whatnot. A hood just doesn't always cut it.

 

[leftnose]

Why would you want to put a filter on such a fine lens? If you are going to use a filter, save some $$$ and buy the non-L version instead.

Optically, there isn't a heck of a lot of difference between the L and non-L 100 macros. The main difference is IS and build quality. So, if you're going to argue that the OP shouldn't put a filter in front of the -L lens for reasons of IQ, you should argue the same thing about the non-L.

 

[RLPhoto]

B&W Kaesemann Circular Polarizer's

Just as an FWIW, I've been told that the MRC Kaesemann circular polarizers are optically identical to the standard MRC circular polarizers. The difference is the construction. The Kaesemann filters are simply sealed around the edge to protect the polarizing foil against humidity and other environmental conditions.

So, if you live in and never leave the desert, a standard MRC polarizer might be money better spent.

At least, that's what I've been told.

Product Highlights - From B&H photo
Helps to Eliminate Reflections and Glare
Reduces Haze and Blue Cast in Landscapes
Greater Color and Tonal Saturation
High Efficiency Kaesemann Foils <------------------------------Exclusive
MRC Multi-Resistant Coating
Rugged Brass Filter Ring
High Quality Schott Glass

"Kaesemann-type filters feature greater optical efficiency than regular polarizing foils and are more neutral in color. The polarizing foils are cemented between plano-parallel optical glass layers, which are then precision-polished to achieve the most accurate plano-parallel surface. This edge sealing protects the filter layers from humidity and are ideal for use with high-speed telephoto and apochromatic lenses."

I've noticed that they don't cool my image as much as the standard B&W polarizers. Its more neutral.

 

[Loswr]

I put a B/W clear mrc filter on my 100 Macro. Why? I shoot 1-4 inches from my subjects occasionally getting poked and scraped by branches and twigs and whatnot. A hood just doesn't always cut it.

+1, and for me it's even more true with the MP-E 65mm.

 

[bkorcel]

True but you will spend a lot less money!!! Why hinder the optical quality of the L glass with something that will affect IQ either in distortion or reflection. Isnt that why we buy L glass in the first place?

This argument will go on for years but my opinion is don't use filters unless you need to such as working in damp or sandy areas where you need the protection.

Why would you want to put a filter on such a fine lens? If you are going to use a filter, save some $$$ and buy the non-L version instead.

Optically, there isn't a heck of a lot of difference between the L and non-L 100 macros. The main difference is IS and build quality. So, if you're going to argue that the OP shouldn't put a filter in front of the -L lens for reasons of IQ, you should argue the same thing about the non-L.

 

[ahsanford]

I needed a new 77mm CPL and instead of the normal B+W MRC, I got the Kaesemann as the prices were shockingly the same. I hope the 'sealing' doesn't make them more annoying to screw in or use, as I love my 58mm B+W MRC CPL.

But it is rumored to be just that slight bit better than what I've been using, and it was the same price. Why not give it a try?

- A

 

[Don Haines]

Why would you want to put a filter on such a fine lens? If you are going to use a filter, save some $$$ and buy the non-L version instead.

IS and focus speed. you can do handheld macro photography.... i tried the L and the non-L version on butterflies in flight.... only the L version came away with sharp and in-focus pictures

Also, while the lens hood is great for non-macro work, it is too big for macro. It blocks light on extreme closeups and can scare away insects...

 

[East Wind Photography]

Dont use a filter on any L glass unless you need to use a polarizer. Filters generally degrade IQ even if ever so slightly. I would not buy an L lens if you prefer to have a filter in front of it. YOu're not taking advantage of everything the lens has to offer.

I ordered a 100mm 2.8 L lens and should be picking up from the store tomorrow. I am planning to use this lens for Macro and Portraits. I use Hood on my other lenses at all times which I plan to do with the new lens as well.

Please suggest what filters I need for Macro and portrait. I do have a Marumi CP (77mm) that I use on my other 2 lens (77mm and 67 mm with a step down/up ring).

Thanks in advance.

 

[Loswr]

Dont use a filter on any L glass unless you need to use a polarizer. Filters generally degrade IQ even if ever so slightly. I would not buy an L lens if you prefer to have a filter in front of it. YOu're not taking advantage of everything the lens has to offer.

I'll just point out that in some cases (16-35L II, 17-40L, 50L), Canon specifically states that a filter is required to complete the dust/weather sealing for the lens. Also, all of the uber expensive supertelephoto lenses (300/2.8 and up) have a drop in filter slot, and Canon states that a filter is part of the optical design so the glass insert should be left in the holder.

 

[East Wind Photography]

That's true and of course if you are going underwater you will need to use an underwater housing that includes a filter in front.

For all other uses, forget the filter.

Dont use a filter on any L glass unless you need to use a polarizer. Filters generally degrade IQ even if ever so slightly. I would not buy an L lens if you prefer to have a filter in front of it. YOu're not taking advantage of everything the lens has to offer.

I'll just point out that in some cases (16-35L II, 17-40L, 50L), Canon specifically states that a filter is required to complete the dust/weather sealing for the lens. Also, all of the uber expensive supertelephoto lenses (300/2.8 and up) have a drop in filter slot, and Canon states that a filter is part of the optical design so the glass insert should be left in the holder.