Official: Canon EOS 7D Mark II

Renzokuken said:
neuroanatomist said:
dilbert said:
In the text there are bits like this:

65-point* all cross-type AF system for high-performance, accurate subject tracking with EV -3 sensitivity (center point) for focusing in extreme low-light conditions

I haven't seen anything indicating what the *'s are for?

Me, either. But I suspect it's a footnote that you don't get 65 points with all lenses. Similarly, with the 1D X/5DIII's 61 AF points, you get only 47 points with the 800/5.6L and only 33 points with the 180L Macro.
"

May I ask? What's the science and logic behind this??

If the DSLR have 65 points hardware wise, what physical limitations contributed to the reduction of working AF points?

The cross-type sensors need at least an aperture of f/4 to get an accurate measurement. Not sure why the 180L is so limited though.
 
Upvote 0
Got feedback on how noise is perceived. "No apparent banding." That's a quick testing in an office environment. Test shots also at ISO 51200. Someone who has taken an abundance of shots on 1D X (and with a number of other professional level cameras) thinks it is close to the AF-performance of 1D X.
 
Upvote 0
Renzokuken said:
neuroanatomist said:
dilbert said:
In the text there are bits like this:

65-point* all cross-type AF system for high-performance, accurate subject tracking with EV -3 sensitivity (center point) for focusing in extreme low-light conditions

I haven't seen anything indicating what the *'s are for?

Me, either. But I suspect it's a footnote that you don't get 65 points with all lenses. Similarly, with the 1D X/5DIII's 61 AF points, you get only 47 points with the 800/5.6L and only 33 points with the 180L Macro.
"

May I ask? What's the science and logic behind this??

If the DSLR have 65 points hardware wise, what physical limitations contributed to the reduction of working AF points?

I expect it's due to the apparent aperture of those lenses being a bit smaller. Macro lenses suffer from that at close focus distances, which is why they're generally 'bumped down' in AF group (e.g. the 100/2.8 macros aren't grouped with other f/2.8 lenses, but with slower lenses). I suspect Canon empirically tests lenses (or simulates such tests), and if the outer columns of AF points aren't reliable enough, they disable them in firmware.


raptor3x said:
The cross-type sensors need at least an aperture of f/4 to get an accurate measurement. Not sure why the 180L is so limited though.

The f/4 crosses are an f/4 line plus an f/5.6 line; with most f/5.6 lenses you have all 61 points, but just the central 21 act as crosses.
 
Upvote 0
Mark D5 TEAM II said:
The EOS 7D Mark II is also the first EOS camera to feature a built-in digital compass which features a triple-axes geomagnetic and acceleration sensor, enabling photographers to record longitude, latitude, elevation and compass direction.

What will an acceleration sensor give a photographer? Is it something more handy for a videographer?

I am also wondering how a internal passive non-gps type sensor can enable photographers to record geocoords with any accuracy?
 
Upvote 0
Re: Why is there not an L-series 24-70 equivalent for cropped sensors?!!

Woody said:
So, the same old same old 70D sensor?

No, it is not - stated clearly in multiple places. New, more sensitive photo diodes, more transmissive Bayer dyes, and the possibility of better A-to-D and processing. Scott Kelby said in his video that it produces the cleanest high ISO images he's ever seen from a crop sensor dSLR. Now, given his past, that might be hyperbole, but since he's unquestionably used the 70D, that means this one should be better.
 
Upvote 0
Another 1-series feature that gets to be included:

Back to the action at hand, and Alessandro’s thoughts on the viewfinder. A 100% field-of-view ensures critical accuracy for tricky compositions and an electronic overlay – new for the EOS 7D Mark II – allowed him to see the focus points selected. There are 65 cross-type focus points on the EOS 7D Mark II, compared to 19 found on the EOS 7D it replaces. “But you know, because I am old-fashioned, I like to shoot Manual and with just single-point AF,” he laughs. “However, I can see exactly what is happening in the viewfinder, which is clear and bright just like my [EOS] 5D Mark III and which shows in red the active focus points as I am tracking the subject. I can tell you one thing: this camera is more advanced than me!”
 
Upvote 0
AcutancePhotography said:
What will an acceleration sensor give a photographer? Is it something more handy for a videographer?

I am also wondering how a internal passive non-gps type sensor can enable photographers to record geocoords with any accuracy?

The acceleration sensor is often used for the electronic level I think.
 
Upvote 0
Very nice feature set for use as action sports and birding camera body. The initial price is lower than I anticipated. And it looks like it will autofocus at F8. Regardless of the naysayers, the original 7D is a GREAT camera and still cranks out wonderful images.

This camera will sell well and I will likely buy one to replace my current 7D. Looking forward to detailed reviews.
 
Upvote 0
Vgramatikov said:
As wildlife photographer there is a lot of important key features.

-Optimized for low-light shooting sensor
-High speed continuous shooting up to 10.0 fps allows you to capture fast action.

now you finally can machinegun wildlife!

http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=22565.msg434314;topicseen#msg434314

http://www.canonrumors.com/forum/index.php?topic=22582.msg434391

;)
 
Upvote 0
Given the time left, if should be ready for Christmas sales...they won't deprive themselves from high sale rates due to the seasonal rush for presents...this time, it requires differently sized stockings for daddy...;-)
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
dilbert said:
In the text there are bits like this:

65-point* all cross-type AF system for high-performance, accurate subject tracking with EV -3 sensitivity (center point) for focusing in extreme low-light conditions

I haven't seen anything indicating what the *'s are for?

Me, either. But I suspect it's a footnote that you don't get 65 points with all lenses. Similarly, with the 1D X/5DIII's 61 AF points, you get only 47 points with the 800/5.6L and only 33 points with the 180L Macro.

Me, either. But I suspect it's a footnote that you don't get 65 points with all lenses. Similarly, with the 1D X/5DIII's 61 AF points, you get only 47 points with the 800/5.6L and only 33 points with the 180L Macro.
Exactly, it does mention it on Canon's website... ;)
 
Upvote 0
Vgramatikov said:
-This sensor enables Canon’s intelligent Tracking and Recognition system (iTR AF) that detects and tracks -subjects, automatically switching the AF point to optimize tracking

To me that feature is the best thing about the whole camera. I usually use the center AF point to focus and then recompose. I know this is a sloppy habit which is not completely accurate but changing AF points with the joystick is not fast enough for me. So I already fell in love with this feature when I heard that the 1D X has it. Will I buy a 7DII? No. But I am looking forward to the 5DIV to have it!
 
Upvote 0
Re: Why is there not an L-series 24-70 equivalent for cropped sensors?!!

Lee Jay said:
Scott Kelby said in his video that it produces the cleanest high ISO images he's ever seen from a crop sensor dSLR.


scott kelby said:
10-frames-per-second! (Drops the mic. Walks off stage). ;-)

someone show him the NX1. :)

now when it´s about tracking the 7D MK2 will be better i guess but from the FPS alone.. 15 are better than 10.
 
Upvote 0