The specs said dual card slot though.Quite nice.
but yet no "yeah" moment.
And single card slot makes me say "ME!"
Upvote
0
The specs said dual card slot though.Quite nice.
but yet no "yeah" moment.
And single card slot makes me say "ME!"
I don't need to, using RF 85mm is exact equal to EF 85mm with IS turn off. (in real world usage)
Now we wait for:
RF 35mm F1.2 L
RF 14-21mm F1.4 L or RF 16-28mm F2
But the first initial reaction before reading the second line was, "oh sh..."1 SD and 1 CF Express... so two slots.
If the R is going to remain as a $2200 body, the replacement should be popular. I expect that the rumor of a new naming scheme portends a higher price.
The lower price for a R right now certainly makes it a bargain, I bought mine when first announced at a $200 discount.
Not if I'm looking at rocking the 85 1.2 or the 28-70Sounds like a silly rule. If the quality matches your expectations, would you not buy the camera just because it uses a different technology to do what it does?
As a photographer these specs are great.
i'd prefer less or crippled video specs and a better price though.
Its a curse for photographers to upgrade their camera and pay more just for video specs.
Like the 5D IV that came out more expensive because it shoots 4k video that i never used and videographers never were happy with it.
Hands up who read down the list, got to "1 Sd Card slot" and thought, 'oh no, what a disappointment!'
i dont think it's too much to hope for dedicated stills cameras again.
Rumored specs add a grand to your estimate. At least.
Canon Eos R5 (Copa Turbo).12 fps would be an incredible upgrade from one body to the next
5mp EVF too... this could be the killer R everybody was waiting for. Sounds good to me!