Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 Wide Angle Review

Status
Not open for further replies.
Vivid Color said:
Dustin, thank you for taking the time to write up and post your review of the Rokinon 14mm ultra-wide lens. As a result of your review, I think this lens will be my next purchase. I've been thinking about getting an ultra-wide, but have been hesitant to do so given the price of Canon's ultra-wides, the known issues with those lenses, and how much I'll likely use the lens. The 14mm Rokinon, it would seem, solves this dilemma.

+1. I'm in the same situation. I've been considering a UWA lens for some time, but none of the Canon options looked that good. Since UWA will be a speciality lens for me, and not used that often, I really didn't want to invest a lot of money on one either. The Rokinon 14mm looks like the nearly perfect solution for me.

Excellent review and pictures once again Dustin!
 
Upvote 0
bholliman said:
Vivid Color said:
Dustin, thank you for taking the time to write up and post your review of the Rokinon 14mm ultra-wide lens. As a result of your review, I think this lens will be my next purchase. I've been thinking about getting an ultra-wide, but have been hesitant to do so given the price of Canon's ultra-wides, the known issues with those lenses, and how much I'll likely use the lens. The 14mm Rokinon, it would seem, solves this dilemma.

+1. I'm in the same situation. I've been considering a UWA lens for some time, but none of the Canon options looked that good. Since UWA will be a speciality lens for me, and not used that often, I really didn't want to invest a lot of money on one either. The Rokinon 14mm looks like the nearly perfect solution for me.

Excellent review and pictures once again Dustin!

Thank you. That was obviously the conclusion I also came to. Considering the "specialty" nature of the lens, the value represented by the Rokinon option is very compelling. I'm actually selling my 17-40L and will put the money towards not only the Rokinon but also to pick up the newly reduced price Canon 35mm f/2 IS
 
Upvote 0
TWI by Dustin Abbott said:
P.S. Another shot to share. You can't tell at this size, but the original is so sharp that you can clearly see my family at the far end of this bridge.


With Thanksgiving by Thousand Word Images by Dustin Abbott, on Flickr

Thousand Thanks, Dear Sir, Mr. Dustin.
I will order this awesome lens this week. Thank for the Test and report the good words of this Lens.
Yes, The Lens is Great, But your Great Photos from the Artistic Ability that you already have in your heart and your brain.
Surapon
 
Upvote 0
distant.star said:
TWI by Dustin Abbott said:
distant.star said:
.
Thanks, Dustin.

I've got one ordered. Should be here Friday for weekend fun.

Sounds like fun. I ended up buying the review copy I had off the distributor, so my copy of the 17-40L is on Kijiji right now (like Craigslist).

That's pretty amazing. I could not imagine being without my 17-40!!!

I'm using the wide end of the Tamron 24-70VC for my ND long exposure work now. My head to head comparisons found that it is actually sharper stopped down to my typical range here (f/8-f/11). If I want to go really wide, I'll use that the 14mm. I don't feel that I will miss the 17-40 much and am strongly considering using some of the proceeds from the sale of the 17-40 towards getting the new 35 f/2 IS.
 
Upvote 0
.
That's another amazing image, Dustin. If I were still in the Sierra foothills, I'd be attempting shots like that. Here in the Philadelphia area I think it's going to be more city lights and buildings for me.

Mine came Friday. Doing a lot of event shooting I haven't had a chance to use it much, but the few shots I've taken indicate it's devastatingly sharp. Sort of nostalgic to go back to the full manual days, setting aperture on the dial and manual focusing!

Thanks for putting me onto this!
 
Upvote 0
distant.star said:
.
That's another amazing image, Dustin. If I were still in the Sierra foothills, I'd be attempting shots like that. Here in the Philadelphia area I think it's going to be more city lights and buildings for me.

Mine came Friday. Doing a lot of event shooting I haven't had a chance to use it much, but the few shots I've taken indicate it's devastatingly sharp. Sort of nostalgic to go back to the full manual days, setting aperture on the dial and manual focusing!

Thanks for putting me onto this!

It is certainly very sharp. The ability to magnify images and not see detail break down is wonderful. And yes, if you have some manual background there is a certain magic to thinking about aperture and focus as a part of the shot. I personally believe that some time invested in those things makes one a better photographer.

Here's another image that shows what the Rokinon is great for: I've chosen a foreground element that is sharply in focus, but the focus remains strong throughout this deep image.


The Road through the Woods by Thousand Word Images by Dustin Abbott, on Flickr
 
Upvote 0
Beautiful images. I remember reading somewhere that this is the second incarnation of this lens, and the first one was much worse. Do you happen to know when this second incarnation was conceived? A friend has got the lens but is not really impresses, but looking at you images it might be that he got hold of the first incarnation.
 
Upvote 0
stephan00 said:
Beautiful images. I remember reading somewhere that this is the second incarnation of this lens, and the first one was much worse. Do you happen to know when this second incarnation was conceived? A friend has got the lens but is not really impresses, but looking at you images it might be that he got hold of the first incarnation.

I just recently heard that myself, and it was helpful to me because I had read other reviews and had seen so many conflicting reports. Unfortunately, I don't know when that changeover was made. I would presume that any of the lenses on sale currently would be the updated design (if that is in fact the case).
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.