seeimpossible.usa.canon.com?

Mitch.Conner said:
kyle86 said:
10 minutes past and nothing there still?

Huh? There's still 14 hours and 45 minutes left.

The counter is done using JavaScript and relying on the local time 9:00 without time zones as some earlier post in this thread mentioned. So one can only guess, which "9:00" they're talking about. Since it's an US site I guess they mean some US-9:00.
 
Upvote 0
lo lite said:
Mitch.Conner said:
kyle86 said:
10 minutes past and nothing there still?

Huh? There's still 14 hours and 45 minutes left.

The counter is done using JavaScript and relying on the local time 9:00 without time zones as some earlier post in this thread mentioned. So one can only guess, which "9:00" they're talking about. Since it's an US site I guess they mean some US-9:00.

With an ad in the New York Times directing people to the site, surely they're relying on EST.

That's sloppy work to rely on local system time rather than use server time.
 
Upvote 0
Mitch.Conner said:
lo lite said:
Mitch.Conner said:
kyle86 said:
10 minutes past and nothing there still?

Huh? There's still 14 hours and 45 minutes left.

The counter is done using JavaScript and relying on the local time 9:00 without time zones as some earlier post in this thread mentioned. So one can only guess, which "9:00" they're talking about. Since it's an US site I guess they mean some US-9:00.

With an ad in the New York Times directing people to the site, surely they're relying on EST.

That's sloppy work to rely on local system time rather than use server time.

yeah its pretty dumb i must say lol
 
Upvote 0
lo lite said:
It will be this: https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=de&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=de&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.golem.de%2Fnews%2Fbildsensor-chip-sieht-mehr-farben-als-das-menschliche-auge-1410-109655.html&edit-text=&act=url

Not hardly. Read my earlier post. Canon Italy has already spilled the beans. It's a marketing campaign. Canon helps its customers see the impossible.
 
Upvote 0
Hi,
My timer also reach 00:00:00... ::)

If timer is on US time, probably only for US, so should not be something major, but a marketing campaign like mention by someone earlier... :(

Anyway, they should just use a timer base on GMT time instead of local time...

Have a nice day.
 
Upvote 0
Mitch.Conner said:
With an ad in the New York Times directing people to the site, surely they're relying on EST.

That's sloppy work to rely on local system time rather than use server time.

Why am I not surprised? Canon seems to struggle with all their software. This was likely not Canon, but the Ad Agency who hired some offshore outfit to do it for $10.
 
Upvote 0
Knut Skywalker said:
I'm sorry if this was already posted, I didn't read the 14 pages that came before me. But I think the box-logo has some similarities with the ImageRunner logo http://www.imagerunneradvance.com/images/imagerunner_advance_logo.png

Maybe they are announcing new printers.

Looks like a cross between that logo and a nuclear reactor, so it must be a nuclear-powered home 3-D printer. It will be called the ObjectRunner, or something equally lame. ;D
 
Upvote 0
Mt Spokane Photography said:
Mitch.Conner said:
With an ad in the New York Times directing people to the site, surely they're relying on EST.

That's sloppy work to rely on local system time rather than use server time.

Why am I not surprised? Canon seems to struggle with all their software. This was likely not Canon, but the Ad Agency who hired some offshore outfit to do it for $10.

Hey hey, don't blame the offshore guy, it passed QA, then its Canon problem :D
 
Upvote 0
meywd said:
Mt Spokane Photography said:
Why am I not surprised? Canon seems to struggle with all their software. This was likely not Canon, but the Ad Agency who hired some offshore outfit to do it for $10.

Hey hey, don't blame the offshore guy, it passed QA, then its Canon problem :D

You are Correct, Canon approved the ad, but apparently did not think to view it in Australia or other parts of the world!

I hope whatever product they are advertising is done better ;)
 
Upvote 0