neuroanatomist said:IMO, 'portrait' implies a living subject. Not that I'm squeamish about a few bones...not after eight years of teaching gross anatomy to medical students.
Orangutan said:neuroanatomist said:IMO, 'portrait' implies a living subject. Not that I'm squeamish about a few bones...not after eight years of teaching gross anatomy to medical students.
I'm willing to grant Atonegro some artistic license on this.
I guess if we want to nitpick: "ORIGIN mid 16th cent.: from French, past participle (used as a noun) of Old French portraire ‘portray’"
Oh, and a bit of Googling: http://www.britishmuseum.org/explore/highlights/articles/e/egyptian_mummy_portraits.aspx
Yes, it's a portrait.
Dude, you're too smart and thoughtful for this kind of argument: if the skeleton had been painted rather than photographed would that have transformed it into a legitimate portrait in your estimation? Painted portrait or photographed portrait are irrelevant. What's important is that it "portrays."neuroanatomist said:What kind of cameras did they use in 16th century France?
I almost addressed this in my original post, but figured you wouldn't go for the obvious fallacy: your original statement was that a portrait should portray a "living subject." The mummy portraits were painted after the death of the subject, and therefore portray a deceased subject. If we take your argument regarding the mummy portraits, then a photo of a taxidermied bird could be a portrait because it represents what the bird would have looked like in life. However, my example only addressed your need for a living subject. It would have been more legitimate on your part to argue that a bird skeleton is not a bird, but that's a different question.Oh, and from your link: "This has proved that the portrait did indeed show the person as they appeared during life."
I like picking nits...![]()
neuroanatomist said:I suppose a portrait is in the eyes of the artist and viewer.
jrista said:neuroanatomist said:jrista said:It is the skeleton of an old, dead bird. Rather morbid...
IMO, 'portrait' implies a living subject.
I agree.
Click said:BEANC0UNTER said:at Least I have a picture of a tern![]()
Nice shot Beancounter.
Nice!serendipidy said:I think his bird just took a tern for the worse.![]()
ERHP said:Nice!serendipidy said:I think his bird just took a tern for the worse.![]()
@Northstar - Love watching them catch large fish.
Here is a 'side portrait' of a Greylag Goose, now something of a resident now at one of the local lakes. I'm thinking about trying to recreate this with my 100mm macro lens but pretty sure that will involve some enticement.
![]()
Click said:Pierre Bonenfant said:Hi,
Here's a bald eagle taken in Nova scotia in 2011 during a heavy snow fall:
P. Bonenfant
Awesome! I really love this shot. Well done.
absolutely gorgeous.... was that shot just north of Kentville?Pierre Bonenfant said:Hi,
Here's a bald eagle taken in Nova scotia in 2011 during a heavy snow fall:
![]()
1DlV / 800mm
Visit my gallery: http://www.pbase.com/pbon
P. Bonenfant
Pierre Bonenfant said:Hi,
Here's a bald eagle taken in Nova scotia in 2011 during a heavy snow fall:
![]()
1DlV / 800mm
Visit my gallery: http://www.pbase.com/pbon
P. Bonenfant
ERHP said:Nice!serendipidy said:I think his bird just took a tern for the worse.![]()
@Northstar - Love watching them catch large fish.
Here is a 'side portrait' of a Greylag Goose, now something of a resident now at one of the local lakes. I'm thinking about trying to recreate this with my 100mm macro lens but pretty sure that will involve some enticement.
![]()
Not to worry. I am sure it was reborn. After all one tern deserves another...serendipidy said:jrista said:neuroanatomist said:jrista said:It is the skeleton of an old, dead bird. Rather morbid...
IMO, 'portrait' implies a living subject.
I agree.
I think his bird just took a tern for the worse.![]()