Show your Bird Portraits

Hi Jack.
I'm here to try to learn, thought my problem was my camera, then people post beautiful pictures using he 7D so now I think it might be my lens, Sigma 150-500, anyone got any really good pics from one of these to prove it is me not the gear! ::) ;D

Ferris, how did you even get the 2400mm effective lens to stop quivering as your heart beat while you tried to frame it, (I'm guessing it's not hand held) come to that how did you know where to point it in the first place, must have been a fair way away almost out of sight? Beautiful pic none the less. It would seem the 7D is capable of great pictures in the right hands, I'm not for one moment suggesting the camera made the shot, if that was the case I'd have pics like that too!

Like Mackguyver said lots of great pics from everyone else too.

Cheers Graham.


Graham,

As I recall, I was using a tripod with that configuration. I'm sure that many people that know more about photography than I do would state that the Sigma 50-500mm is not the world's sharpest or fastest lens, but I find its wide and deep range to be very useful, and I appreciate its image stabilization, which allows me to handhold it. I can JUST handhold it with a 2x teleconverter attached, and can ALMOST handhold it with both a 2x and a 1.4x attached.

So, in that situation with the Red-tailed Hawk, I was using a tripod to help me stabilize things, and taking plenty of photos. The juvenile was good enough to be sitting rather peacefully on a relatively close perch for an extended period of time. For additional looks at this Hawk, use the following link, and keep clicking on the left arrow to go through them all. http://www.flickr.com/photos/37648871@N06/7477026706/#in/photostream/
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
jrista said:
The day you can say, with complete confidence and clarity, that it's your lens or your camera that are preventing you from achieving the quality you expect, that's the day you should buy the necessary replacement part.

Alternatively, you could just go out and buy top of the line gear, such as a 1D X and 600mm f/4L IS II. Then you can be certain that only you are preventing you from achieving the quality you expect. ;)

I must confess I find that much more palatable, sorry jrista! ;) CR is always good for some kind of chuckle.

Jack
 
Upvote 0
neuroanatomist said:
jrista said:
The day you can say, with complete confidence and clarity, that it's your lens or your camera that are preventing you from achieving the quality you expect, that's the day you should buy the necessary replacement part.

Alternatively, you could just go out and buy top of the line gear, such as a 1D X and 600mm f/4L IS II. Then you can be certain that only you are preventing you from achieving the quality you expect. ;)

Yes, well, that is generally my personal approach...however I ran into the limitations of the 7D and 100-400 in about four months. I bought the 600/4 II already. Now it's just a matter of getting the body. I'd get a 1D X, but I already put a bunch of money into astrophotography equipment, so it'll be the 5D III instead. :P

If someone has money to burn, that's certainly my recommendation....however for everyone else...use your gear until you fully understand it, and can properly elucidate WHY it's holding you back. ;)
 
Upvote 0
Do you mind? I am eating.

A small flock of Redwings stripped the remaining berries from our tree.
IMG_8823.jpg


A dull cloudy winter's day, so not ideal conditions.

Canon EOS M + EF-S 55-250mm IS STM
 
Upvote 0
I thought the comment regarding attaching shooting info to shots to be really a good idea. As the man said, there are lots of super cool shots online, how you made the shot is the interesting part .

As for the lusting after high end gear, I try not think about that as I have 3 daughters. First it was college, (I measured money invested in education in Porsche Boxters I could have bought ) now it is weddings ( measure money spent in 1dx and 600mm's I could have bought ) I just try to get close to my subject and have fun. ;)

Yellow-rumped Warbler
Canon 60D - 100-400mm
ISO320, 400mm, f/6.3, 1/1250 handheld, manual mode, auto iso - center focus
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4786.jpg
    IMG_4786.jpg
    914 KB · Views: 464
Upvote 0
I agree. Dull days really can be great if the circumstances are good. This Black-capped Chickadee was photographed with a T1i and either a Sigma 150-500mm OS or a Sigma 50-500mm OS at 500mm on a day that was relatively drab.
 

Attachments

  • Vertical Takeoff.jpg
    Vertical Takeoff.jpg
    317.5 KB · Views: 379
Upvote 0