Show your Bird Portraits

I decided to get into bird photography last April... these a few of what I think are my best shots.
Any constructive criticism would be great.

14744058660_aed1437d72_k.jpg


14052911098_26f3cc894a_k.jpg


14731656083_412f80709d_k.jpg


14008094298_a285f0d222_k.jpg


14200754153_63a5c0c187_k.jpg


14157462266_8acdae7ba9_k.jpg


14039262730_186fbbfe53_k.jpg
 
Upvote 0
nateg said:
I decided to get into bird photography last April... these a few of what I think are my best shots.
Any constructive criticism would be great.
---8<--Snip!--8<---

They're all great! You have good, smooth, backgrounds in general. DOF enough for the bird. Punchy colours without overdoing it.
The last one, which looks like an Eurasian Reed Warbler I shot a 2-3 years ago, could possibly be a little tighter.
 
Upvote 0
DominoDude said:
nateg said:
I decided to get into bird photography last April... these a few of what I think are my best shots.
Any constructive criticism would be great.
---8<--Snip!--8<---

They're all great! You have good, smooth, backgrounds in general. DOF enough for the bird. Punchy colours without overdoing it.
The last one, which looks like an Eurasian Reed Warbler I shot a 2-3 years ago, could possibly be a little tighter.

Hi, Thanks for the suggesttion I've given that a go.. Think it has helped. N

14039262730_c6d3bb7980_o.jpg
 
Upvote 0
nateg said:
DominoDude said:
nateg said:
I decided to get into bird photography last April... these a few of what I think are my best shots.
Any constructive criticism would be great.
---8<--Snip!--8<---

They're all great! You have good, smooth, backgrounds in general. DOF enough for the bird. Punchy colours without overdoing it.
The last one, which looks like an Eurasian Reed Warbler I shot a 2-3 years ago, could possibly be a little tighter.

Hi, Thanks for the suggesttion I've given that a go.. Think it has helped. N

--8<--8<--

I think so too. *thumbs up*
My experience with those birds that are rather grey (monochromatic) in their appearance, is that photos of them are more interesting if I can see textures on the feathers, or a hint of their eye colour for example. Either that or I back out totally and try to get them with a substantial part of their environment. I have a hard drive with numerous examples of not so interesting shots of these. I keep them to annoy me, and to make me do better the next time.

You're doing great and I look forward to see more from you.
 
Upvote 0
Vossie said:
Shot this Kingfisher last year with a (rented) 600 f/4 IS II and 1.4x III. Surely my favorite bird. I was lucky to get up very close, the images are uncropped! No tripod was used on this shot, but I did use a pile of branched as a hide and for support.


Beautiful shots. I love this bird. Well done Vossie.
 
Upvote 0
Vossie said:
Shot this Kingfisher last year with a (rented) 600 f/4 IS II and 1.4x III. Surely my favorite bird. I was lucky to get up very close, the images are uncropped! No tripod was used on this shot, but I did use a pile of branched as a hide and for support.

Great shots of a remarkable little bird, Vossie!
I've seen Kingfishers a few times this year, at rather close distances, but still I have to find places like these, where they actually stay for a short while so that I can shoot them. We have nicknamed them "blue darts", since they're almost always just seen as a short blue streak passing by with the afterburners lit. They're putting a toll on my patience and the cameras AF-system. *gnashes teeth*
 
Upvote 0