Single point auto focus

[stessel tank]

Single point auto focus

Just interested how many people use single point a/f most of the time,with the amount of options on all new camera's e.g af expansion/zone af/41 point/61point etc

I find i keep on going back to single point

 

[paul13walnut5]

Almost always centre point select + aiservo or + oneshot depending on subject.

If exlusively shooting sports may switch to zone.

 

[Mt Spokane Photography]

Almost always centre point select + aiservo or + oneshot depending on subject.

If exlusively shooting sports may switch to zone.

+1

 

[bdunbar79]

I'm a sports photog, and believe it or not, I primarily use single-point AF. It would be silly to use multiple-point during a basketball or football game and have the camera pick a closer player not involved in the action as focal point. Just lock on and fire. If, however, I want to track a moving player, I'll use zone and let it track across the zone, in AI Servo, with AF Case #2. The only time I have used zone in basketball is with my 1DX and face recognition. Now that actually works, unless there are a ton of faces in your scene. Then it's trickier.

 

[davidchang]

single center point and recompose on 5d2 100%, on 7d zone + servo most of the time.

 

[sanj]

My focus point selection varies all the time depending upon the situation.

 

[steen-ag]

Have a 5D-II. Always use singlepoint with helppoints. The recompose

 

[AlanF]

For static bird photography, always. I use back button focus and AI servo.

 

[bycostello]

Have a 5D-II. Always use singlepoint with helppoints. The recompose

+1

 

[PavelR]

1D4 - single point (not central and enabled only cross type) without any expansion - all the time - on static and moving subjects.
(Automatic restore of AF point selection on camera orientation change helps a lot.)

 

[Steve Todd]

I use back button (AF-ON) focusing in AI Servo mode, exclusively for the majority of my shooting (landscape, wildlife/birding, auto racing (NASCAR, NHRA & ALMS), architecture, people, street, travel, etc.). Using AI Servo and back button focusing, allows me to track moving subjects (holding the button down) independently of shutter release, which I find results in faster and better results (more spot-on focus). For static or slow moving subjects, I just press the button to gain focus and release it to lock focus. This works really well in recomposing the shot while maintaining focus and eliminates having to select other than the center AF point or points (expanded or zone). I also use the Auto AF point selection method in AI Servo on some moving subjects, allowing the initial AF point to continue to track the subject across the frame. The back button/AI Servo method allows me to switch between one shot and AI Servo instantly, without having to dedicate another button or make changes by changing camera settings. I was hesitant at first to use this method. However, now that I ues it full-time, I wonder how I could ever do without it! My digital bodies are as follows: EOS-1D X, 1D4, 5D2, 5D. Film bodies: 2x EOS-1V and a 1n. My Lenses are: 20-35, 24T/S, 24-105L, 28-300L, 50 1.2L, 70-200 2.8L, 70-300L and 100-400L. They (lenses) all work excellently using the AF methods I listed above.
Happy shooting!

 

[FatDaddyJones]

Single point or spot AF probably 90% of the time. What I'd like to know is how many actually change the focus point to compose their image rather than lock on with the center point and recompose. It sure seems a lot faster to me than having to tinker with moving points around.

 

[RLPhoto]

90% of my 5D3 shooting is precise Single Point, the Other 10% is AF-expansion + Assist-beam.

 

[sdsr]

Center point + recompose seems quicker and easier for my purposes.

 

[Loswr]

Single point or spot AF probably 90% of the time. What I'd like to know is how many actually change the focus point to compose their image rather than lock on with the center point and recompose. It sure seems a lot faster to me than having to tinker with moving points around.

Center point + recompose seems quicker and easier for my purposes.

Center point and recompose is certainly faster and easier...and if I'm shooting at f/5.6 with a reasonably distant subject, it's fine because the deeper DoF will mask the backfocus.

But if you're shooting with a fast prime wide open, focus-recompose is a surefire way to get a backfocused shot. Some relevant reading: Why Focus-Recompose Sucks.

Personally, I move the AF point around as needed. I have the default points set off center, and I use orientation-linked AF point to speed things up. The only time I use an automatic selection mode is in AI Servo for face tracking, where I've already manually selected the starting AF point.

 

[Shawn L]

Personally, I move the AF point around as needed. I have the default points set off center, and I use orientation-linked AF point to speed things up. The only time I use an automatic selection mode is in AI Servo for face tracking, where I've already manually selected the starting AF point.

+1

Shawn L.

 

[JaxPhotographer]

Center point and recompose is certainly faster and easier...and if I'm shooting at f/5.6 with a reasonably distant subject, it's fine because the deeper DoF will mask the backfocus.

But if you're shooting with a fast prime wide open, focus-recompose is a surefire way to get a backfocused shot. Some relevant reading: Why Focus-Recompose Sucks.

Personally, I move the AF point around as needed. I have the default points set off center, and I use orientation-linked AF point to speed things up. The only time I use an automatic selection mode is in AI Servo for face tracking, where I've already manually selected the starting AF point.

Neuro, your link provides a very effective illustration of the error with focus-recompose for shallow DoF situations. Makes me wonder how many photographers think they have a camera-lense problem with back focusing when it is a technique issue.

 

[RustyTheGeek]

We've been down this road before. It's a personal preference. Suffice to say that there are two methods (Center + Recompose or Choose AF Pt) outlined in this discussion and both work fine in most cases. The argument for moving focus points around instead of recomposing with the center point is sound on paper but not very practical in most cases of shooting. (IMHO) Nuero's compromise where he starts out with his AF pt off center might save some effort, I'm not sure. I guess once you get accustomed to moving the points around with the controls it may get easier but in general I don't think it really matters much until you get into the 2" DOF extremes like is mentioned in the linked article. If I'm on a tripod in a studio, I can take the time to do anything I want including just tweaking the focus manually.

Personally, I have always used the "center and recompose" method when I shoot "in the field" (not on a tripod in a studio). I naturally keep in mind the DOF I have to work with and compensate when necessary. To me the "center and recompose" method is a lot simpler than futzing with AF pts all the time and missing the shot. The shot is what I am concentrating on, not the AF pt position. Sometimes, center and recompose isn't even fast enough. And if you change cameras, you have to start over on learning to change the points again. Ugh. And many cameras don't have a selectable AF point feature so you're back to center and recompose anyway.

 

[enice128]

I use center single-point & back button whether in one shot or servo. Isnt the center square supposed to be the sharpest & most sensitive ???? I have the 1D IV.....or are the other 4 points inside the centre circle all the same? i used to use orientation-linked points but was told to try this method so now in confused again! I'm shooting some basketball tonite so if i can get some input here would be great ....thnaks!!!

 

[bdunbar79]

I use center single-point & back button whether in one shot or servo. Isnt the center square supposed to be the sharpest & most sensitive ???? I have the 1D IV.....or are the other 4 points inside the centre circle all the same? i used to use orientation-linked points but was told to try this method so now in confused again! I'm shooting some basketball tonite so if i can get some input here would be great ....thnaks!!!

Depends. On the 1DX, the center strip of points, sans the top and bottom points, are dual cross type points, so should theoretically be equally sensitive. I have not read any literature on the matter, so I could be incorrect. I cannot remember the points on the 1D4, sorry.