neuroanatomist said:dilbert said:ahsanford said:1) Forgive me for posturing -- I didn't start this thread as a cause to bolt, flip, migrate, or happy dance. I just find the offering a step towards a Sony having a more fully fleshed out lens portfolio.
2) I have no delusions whatsoever that these lenses will perform across the board as well as their closest Canon counterparts. They are likely to be sharp for their ~ $2k asking prices (the 70-200 has no price as of this moment!), but other than that, all bets are off. I highly doubt they are as well-built and well thought through as current L lenses.
3) I also ran a quick weight assessment for fun (source: B&H):
The small walkaround setup:
5D3 + 28mm f/2.8 IS USM = 1,121g
A7R II + 35mm f/2.8 + 2 extra batteries = 835g
The pickle jar setup:
5D3 + 24-70 2.8L II = 1,665 g
A7R II + 24-70 2.8 GM + 2 extra batteries = 1,616g
...
How about a "Lets add enough weight to the A7RII setup so that it no longer has as big of a weight advantage."
How about a 'let's stop taking pictures afte a couple of hours because of the a7RII's poor battery life." :![]()
Just bring extra batteries.
The point holds, though: the a7RII's weight advantage is most significant with the body cap in place.
Upvote
0