Click said:Very dramatic sky. Nicely done.
Thanks!
Upvote
0
Click said:Very dramatic sky. Nicely done.
Varg said:CarlTN said:Varg said:6D + 24-105 F4L (...)
Sorry to be harsh (not trying to be), but there's too much empty sky in the upper 2/3 of the image. Do you have any other versions that pan down slightly, and perhaps have slightly more exposure?
It's OK, I appreciate your input. That was the lowest I could get. In PP I was troubled whith that empty sky and I considered cropping, but I didn't like the results so I left it as it's showed. I also underexposed it in PP... I always tend to underexpose in PP.
CarlTN said:What is PP, and why do you like to underexpose?
Valvebounce said:Hi Carl.
My understanding PP post processing, Lightroom etc. can't answer for the OP regards underexposure, but at least they try PP, I have no idea what to do with the software I have!
Cheers Graham.
CarlTN said:What is PP, and why do you like to underexpose?
CarlTN said:Valvebounce said:Hi Carl.
My understanding PP post processing, Lightroom etc. can't answer for the OP regards underexposure, but at least they try PP, I have no idea what to do with the software I have!
Cheers Graham.
CarlTN said:What is PP, and why do you like to underexpose?
Hi Graham...thank you, I thought "PP" was an acronym for a specific software...duhhh I was overthinking it!
Which software is giving you a problem?
Varg said:CarlTN said:Varg said:6D + 24-105 F4L (...)
Sorry to be harsh (not trying to be), but there's too much empty sky in the upper 2/3 of the image. Do you have any other versions that pan down slightly, and perhaps have slightly more exposure?
It's OK, I appreciate your input. That was the lowest I could get. In PP I was troubled whith that empty sky and I considered cropping, but I didn't like the results so I left it as it's showed. I also underexposed it in PP... I always tend to underexpose in PP.
wickidwombat said:Varg said:CarlTN said:Varg said:6D + 24-105 F4L (...)
Sorry to be harsh (not trying to be), but there's too much empty sky in the upper 2/3 of the image. Do you have any other versions that pan down slightly, and perhaps have slightly more exposure?
It's OK, I appreciate your input. That was the lowest I could get. In PP I was troubled whith that empty sky and I considered cropping, but I didn't like the results so I left it as it's showed. I also underexposed it in PP... I always tend to underexpose in PP.
crop it off and make it a panorama
Varg said:wickidwombat said:Varg said:CarlTN said:Varg said:6D + 24-105 F4L (...)
Sorry to be harsh (not trying to be), but there's too much empty sky in the upper 2/3 of the image. Do you have any other versions that pan down slightly, and perhaps have slightly more exposure?
It's OK, I appreciate your input. That was the lowest I could get. In PP I was troubled whith that empty sky and I considered cropping, but I didn't like the results so I left it as it's showed. I also underexposed it in PP... I always tend to underexpose in PP.
crop it off and make it a panorama
Cropped and a little less underexposed...
Valvebounce said:Hi Carl.
I have DPP and UFRAW for raw manipulation and the Gimp for jpeg manipulation.
I'm not really so much having problems with software as much as having a problem getting enthused to spend ages fiddling to see my pictures get worse, it seems whatever I do with sliders and curves etc the image always looks better when reset to default settings. This has he effect of not being encouragement enough to invest in non open source software, particularly shy of buying the wrong software as I don't know what I want to achieve!
I'm sure it is more the fact I don't seem to have an artistic bone in my body.
Show me a drawing for a component and I can pretty much superimpose the tool on it mentally but ask me to draw a line I got to get a rule!
Cheers Graham.
CarlTN said:Valvebounce said:Hi Carl.
My understanding PP post processing, Lightroom etc. can't answer for the OP regards underexposure, but at least they try PP, I have no idea what to do with the software I have!
Cheers Graham.
CarlTN said:What is PP, and why do you like to underexpose?
Hi Graham...thank you, I thought "PP" was an acronym for a specific software...duhhh I was overthinking it!
Which software is giving you a problem?
Varg said: