The Green Ring - Worth it? 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM

Status
Not open for further replies.
briansquibb said:
Tijn said:
The new 70-300L IS (2010) has one stop better IS than the DO, it's as sharp as the 70-200 f/4L, it has weathersealing and at the longer zoom range is a bit slower than the 70-200 f/4L. Length wise it fits somewhat in between the 70-200 f/4L and the DO. But weighing about 1kg I doubt you should consider this as a travel lens.

I would totally disagree - I find the 70-300L an excellent travel lens, the 1/2lb difference in weight is neither here nor there - but its compact size is relevant when putting it into a small bag. The extra reach over the 70-200 f/4 makes it far more versatile. If you have a crop body then this coupled with a 17-55 f/2.8 makes the ideal pairing for the minimal travel kit covering 17-300 with just two high quality lens.

Also agree with Brian, the 70-300L is easy to carry since it is not as tall, most of the weight is close to you hand to it does not feel as heavy, it is compact, has great IQ and is Tack sharp. A definite lens for me to take on travel after the 24-105mm.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.