N
noodle
Guest
Rishaar said:That doesn't explain MichaelCruz though....argg this is exciting !
He said he was going on a photoshoot........ guess who got shot?!
Upvote
0
Rishaar said:That doesn't explain MichaelCruz though....argg this is exciting !
astrocrab said:K-amps said:Based on pics like this, how could Canon track who it was? (unless there's just 1 pair of 1dx/5diii's in Dubai)
How many 5d3 do you think there are in Dubai?
i doubt more then 3-4.
noodle said:So for an avid amateur whose action shots are a definite low percentage of overall subjects to shoot, does my rationale make sense?
necator said:EYEONE said:That is what it does. But I was suggesting a custom option where pressing it would toggle the preview on and the aperture would stay stepped down until you pressed the button again.
But for what use? To always have a dark and unusable viewfinder?
But to be honest, I can live quite well without the DOF-preview. For me it's a nice feature for beginners, but if you have photographed a little, you'll know how it'll look (approximately).
But perhaps that just my fault having learned in the middle-ages where pictures still were analog ...
dilbert said:This is one very very long week!!!!!
Other than Canon, I'll bet no one is happier to see a product like this come out than Visa and Mastercard.Fairbanks said:2. On whether to buy this new thingy: I'm a recreational shooter and own a 5DII. Do I need a 5DIII? No. Can I afford a 5DIII? Probably, but not without a fair amount of sacrifice. But, dang, I'll probably buy one eventually, so might as well snap it up and put it on the credit card. ;D
noodle said:Rishaar said:That doesn't explain MichaelCruz though....argg this is exciting !
He said he was going on a photoshoot........ guess who got shot?!
heron88 said:Completely agree with the above. I'm a strong believer in controlled leaks. If I ran a corporation like Canon or Nikon, I would definitely utilize controlled leaks as a free mass marketing and hype generator
pachelbelscanon5d said:I couldn't agree more with Fairbanks. It seems fairly obvious that these photos were leaked intentionally from Canon. Like he said, there are a VERY limited number of these Cameras out in the world right now. Probably under 20, definitely under 50. Especially ones with the actual "5D Mark III" logo on them. The NDA is of course water-tight. Canon is a multi-national company with the top lawyers around. The punishment for actually leaking something that you weren't supposed to would trump any personal advantage of helping out the "masses". Canon did this for publicity, and it worked. Canon nailed it. They leaked some photos and got the buzz going. Friday will be a very special day.
The 24-105 is too much money to do that, I could see the 28-135 or something close to that price range (although I'd be stoked if it was the 24-105).Justin said:The way for Canon to make a splash here is simple, price.
Price it at $2699, just like the 5d2 at release. Drop the 5D2 to $1999. And voila. Loads of sales.
The thing that doesn't add up about the rumors is the price. $3500 is a lot of coin. The inclusion of the 24-105 kit lens in that price makes a lot more sense. So I imagine that's the deal.
wookiee2cu said:The 24-105 is too much money to do that, I could see the 28-135 or something close to that price range (although I'd be stoked if it was the 24-105).