The new 5D Mark III ?!?! PICS!

[Jamesy]

It's all happening!

Now were talking!!! Excellent shots!

 

[Studio B]

This is getting exciting!

 

[SPL]

can not wait for Fri.!

 

[SPL]

Same battery as 5D II ?!

 

[xROELOFx]

Same battery as 5D II ?!

i hope so! it does say LP-E6 in the spec list, but someone mentioned on another topic that it's probably a version 2 of that battery. if that's true, let's hope both versions are compatible in both camera's.

 

[SPL]

I have to say I'm a little disappointed. Canon still don't have a built-in eyepiece cover for the 5D line like the Nikon D700 - making you use that S___ty little rubber eyepiece cover that might be attached to your neck strap, if you use a neck strap.

First chink the armor.

GRRRRRRR!!!!!

I have to say, I agree also,..I was was really hoping for this feature!

 

[KHAWACHEN]

What do you guys think about the body design? looks about same?..

 

[SPL]

Mmm,…interesting to look at them and compare them side by side. I like the new III!

 

[kenraw]

Mmm,…interesting to look at them and compare them side by side. I like the new III!

looks like the DOF button is in a better place than the 7d, I'll be assigning servo focus to that button

The more I look at this camera the more I love it. :-*

 

[SPL]

good idea,..I like your button assignment idea!

 

[Aminimax]

Uuups... I really don't get it:
The Mk. II was THE video machine, missing basically only one important feature: Articuated screen... and what do I see in these images?


...

What do you think: Live view w/o this feature is close to useless and video is much the ssame, don't you think so?

 

[alfa_schumi]

I made up a quick side by side comparison. The Mark III has a very similar and familiar button layout to the 7D.

It is nice to see them side by side. But you have a wring photo of the back of the mark 2, your photo is of the original 5D.

 

[kpk1]

The first on the second line is a 5D1 ... missing AF-ON button.

 

[Studio B]

The first on the second line is a 5D1 ... missing AF-ON button.

Opps sorry will fix. BRB

 

[zackck]

Funny story. I've never had ANYTHING to complain about the Mark II. In fact it's the best camera I own.

Great, I MEAN GREAT IMAGE QUALITY;
never had much problem with AF, you just have to learn how to use it;
battery life is great;
LCD is great;
body is built like a rock;
great viewfinder;
video is GREAT for what it is... (and I run two webshows based on it)

So I don't see much of a point upgrading to the Mark III.
Most stablished 35mm photographers that I know and own a half-life Mark II agrees with me.
Can't see this being a big hit.

 

[Studio B]

Here's the corrected image comparing the two.

 

[CowGummy]

Funny story. I've never had ANYTHING to complain about the Mark II. In fact it's the best camera I own.

Great, I MEAN GREAT IMAGE QUALITY;
never had much problem with AF, you just have to learn how to use it;
battery life is great;
LCD is great;
body is built like a rock;
great viewfinder;
video is GREAT for what it is... (and I run two webshows based on it)

So I don't see much of a point upgrading to the Mark III.
Most stablished 35mm photographers that I know and own a half-life Mark II agrees with me.
Can't see this being a big hit.

Great to hear you're still enjoying your MkII - I only recently upgraded myself (Dec.'11) and think I'll let the dust settle on the MkIII before considering it. The MkII is still an awesome camera, I too come from a 35mm background, and have to agree with you. And the AF is good imho - I mean it has AF! I do still like turning that focus ring myself mind you... (bad) habit?

 

[thatcherk1]

Funny story. I've never had ANYTHING to complain about the Mark II. In fact it's the best camera I own.

Great, I MEAN GREAT IMAGE QUALITY;
never had much problem with AF, you just have to learn how to use it;
battery life is great;
LCD is great;
body is built like a rock;
great viewfinder;
video is GREAT for what it is... (and I run two webshows based on it)

So I don't see much of a point upgrading to the Mark III.
Most stablished 35mm photographers that I know and own a half-life Mark II agrees with me.
Can't see this being a big hit.

The reason some people are dissatisfied with the 5D is because they shoot wildlife, weddings, sports, photojournalism. All of these demand many AF points, and at times fast frame rate. Not all types of photography require these two things. But if you make a living shooting these subjects, then you need these features.
Pair this with the fact that Nikon's competitor to the 5D has a faster frame rate (with grip) and many more AF points. Also Canon's next cheapest camera the 7D is packed with features, but is only a crop sensor. It's tough knowing that you can pay a similar price or less to have these features.

Also there is the issue that the 5D has arguably the best image quality from Canon's line. On the other hand, the 1D and 1Ds have a top level features, where the 5D lacks severely. Now you end up having to choose high quality image vs. high level features.

That's my $1 (my opinion is worth more than two cents)

 

[Studio B]

Please tell me they kept the AF Micro Adjustment.

 

[Axilrod]

Just preordered mine, price is definitely $3499, they already had an SKU for it. I was 4th on the list, which is crazy considering it hasn't even been announced yet.