Mt Spokane Photography said:With prices dropping on the 7D MK II, Canon will need to make a 80D pretty special to cause people to pay $900 or $1000 for it when they can get a gray market 7D MK II for near that price.
nhz said:I don't do video (yet) but I agree with all that. I'm not interested in heavy bricks like the 7D2 (as heavy as a FF camera!). I really want a tilt screen, a good viewfinder and reliable AF (which is questionable with the 70D) and up-to-date sensor with good low ISO DR (looks like this is still more than 1 year off with Canon). I would pay extra money for an extra small/light AND capable body.
Analogphoto said:Having an APS-C body right now, I'm impatiently waiting for an updated 6D.
Grown up using wet film and field of depth depending on aperture, the APS-C just doesn't cut it for me. Good for family mementoes and such, in my personal way of thinking, but that's about it.
Please Canon, end my wait!
Azathoth said:Probably the 80D gets 8fps and the 5Dmk3 AF system. And maybe a f8 central focus point. And the 750/760d sensor. And maybe but probably not, 4K video. And dual card slots.
Nininini said:The only thing I really miss from a full frame is the size and brightness of the viewfinder.
I really don't understand why Canikon keep using pentamirror in their rebel lines. Pentax manages to put a pentaprism in the super cheapo K50. I don't think pentaprisms are actually that expensive.
whatta said:one more thing. I don't understand why an iphone can do things, a dedicated camera body costing the same cannot.
4K, 240fps video, 15fps still.
thanks for your answerNininini said:I think I know. The larger the sensor the more heat the camera produces.whatta said:one more thing. I don't understand why an iphone can do things, a dedicated camera body costing the same cannot.
4K, 240fps video, 15fps still.
SO......Canon has issues putting 4k in full frame.
BUT...they can most definitely put it in APS-C and especially rebel lines. Smaller sensor, no weather sealing.
BUT....they don't want to. Imagine an SL1 getting 4k while the $4000 full frame doesn't have it.
gps is indeed a good point. sometimes I "retake" a photo with my phone just to have the coordinates.Berty Rampkin said:Apart from the apple like minor upgrades, focus peaking, zebra etc, would probably make it a worthy successor to the 70d. A few more focus point, a built in GPS, maybe a mega pixel or two increase is just getting boring. Chopping and changing the same thing in different cameras is getting a bit boring.
whatta said:Personally I don't care about 4k (yet), but high fps yes. Same problem you think?
shutterlag said:"We don't expect anything too revolutionary like 4k video."
Wha????
My wife's 2 year old Sony smartphone has 4k video.
ritholtz said:AF tracking system with active focus point display in Servo mode is pretty good . I also noticed those not so in focus pics with far subject and f2.8. I am going to call Canon and see if they can fix it.ashmadux said:Looking for this one. LOVE the 70d's usability...except that wonky AF (non live view) that seems to have paid the price for a having a utterly awesome AF tracking system. The 7D's old AF system...I suspect..is suspect. Allegedly.
Some more updated features will make this an easy buy.
Come on canon...make it happen.
Canon 70D has Digic 5+.dilbert said:Will it be DIGIC 6 or DIGIC 6+?
The 70D is DIGIC 5 but with the 1DXII, Canon leapfrogged DIGIC 6 and went straight to DIGIC 6+.
The only case where Canon have continued with older DIGIC chips has been the EOS 1x00D line.
If the 80D is DIGIC 6+ what does that mean for the rest of the camera?
I'd be willing to bet that it would therefore include 4K, for starters.
Also, after Canon delivered 1080p in the 5D Mark II, 1080p was in all DSLRs from Canon except the 1x00D line.
4K is the "new normal video" feature now.
whatta said:gps is indeed a good point. sometimes I "retake" a photo with my phone just to have the coordinates.Berty Rampkin said:Apart from the apple like minor upgrades, focus peaking, zebra etc, would probably make it a worthy successor to the 70d. A few more focus point, a built in GPS, maybe a mega pixel or two increase is just getting boring. Chopping and changing the same thing in different cameras is getting a bit boring.
Disagree - processing power scales with the number of pixels, the color depth, the frame rate, and the complexity of algorithms. Sensor size has a strong impact on many parameters, but not on processing power.sigh said:As I understand it - and someone can correct me if I'm wrong - the larger the sensor, the more processing power is required. A larger sensor also produces more heat, so you need to have an effective method for managing that.