I can't wait to get my F11 Trinity 600mm 800mm 100-400mm.
If they could make a 11-105mm F11 I'd have a full house.
If they could make a 11-105mm F11 I'd have a full house.
Upvote
0
At the beginning, I was really enthusiastic about the RF line, but now not so much.
I still can't believe that by 2021 Canon is not providing us with:
- a 35mm f/1.4 or f/1.2 whatever
- an UWA zoom
- a telepho portrait lens, be it the rumoured 70-135 or a 135mm prime
WTF!!!
Agree. Especially at the wide end, IS in a lens won't be needed if the future RF bodies all have IBIS. I would rather save weight and money on non IS versions.I wish there'll be a none IS version of the RF 15-35 F2.8 IS coming. As a landscape photog, the IS on this lens is just not necessary. But with the IS, it adds weight and price, heck, it's even bigger and heavier than the EF 16-35mm F2.8.
As a user of the EF f4 L series zooms, and since Canon has primarily focused on the RF f2 or 2.8 L series zooms, I now wish Canon would address the RF f4 series zooms more adequately. They have an RF 24-105f4 L and and upcoming RF 70-200’f4 L. Not any in the f4 ultrawide yet. Its sort of unlikely that I would upgrade to an expensive R body until the f4 L line is complete.
As I see it now, if I do add another Canon body it would probably be the R6 with an adapter to use my 17-40 L and 70-200’f4 L. Both are non IS lenses. I would then still use my 5DIV also.
For UWA zoom, the RF 15-35mm f/2.8 is already out, what's wrong with that one?
There were rumors about RF-crop ... So, there should be lenses
Absolutely. If you shoot interiors where tripods are not permitted, or any kind of video, it is totally useless to have a few extra stops of IS over just the IBIS.Agree. Especially at the wide end, IS in a lens won't be needed if the future RF bodies all have IBIS. I would rather save weight and money on non IS versions.
I can't believe this place is still full of people that thinkAt the beginning, I was really enthusiastic about the RF line, but now not so much.
I still can't believe that by 2021 Canon is not providing us with:
- a 35mm f/1.4 or f/1.2 whatever
- an UWA zoom
- a telepho portrait lens, be it the rumoured 70-135 or a 135mm prime
WTF!!!
Hope you are being sarcastic, cause I totally don't agree with you.
f2.8 trinity,
50 1.2, 85 1.2, and 28-70 f2, and 35 f1.8
So that is 3 fast zooms and 3 fast primes. (remember this article is about 2021). They posted the likely lens line up for this year with a 50 f1.8 and 85 f2 among them. (https://www.canonrumors.com/this-is-likely-canons-lens-roadmap-for-2020/). So what other fast prime would one want? Perhaps a 135 or 24? Canon is going quite a good job pushing out fast glass. It is time for them to also present some more budget friendly lenses for the R6, just like it needs high end lenses.
For example people will definitely want some f4 zooms available.
Canon is doomed!Lets hope brighter than f/8.
Maybe the aperture number is new cripple hammer?
Lets hope brighter than f/8.
Maybe the aperture number is new cripple hammer?
Me too.. I'll be looking forward to the 18-45mm .. 18mm UWA for most people is plenty.Looks like Canon is reaching out to weight conscious folks like me in their RF lens roadmap: 24-105mm f/4-7.1 IS STM, 50mm f/1.8 IS STM and now 18-45mm IS STM. Willing to bet the 18-45mm is gonna have a small aperture, say, f/4-7.1.
Canon's use of a single diameter for the lenses on the M lineup make this a nothing burger problem.Canon should avoid the balkanization of filter sizes seen in the M line.
an 18-35mm 1.8 full frame would most likely cost a few thousand. even from Sigma.I really need sigma to release a nice Full Frame 18-35 f1.8 lens because i can't afford another few thousand for the RF 15-35 atm
Canon's use of a single diameter for the lenses on the M lineup make this a nothing burger problem.