@lote82
Thanks for writing !
What is wrong with sticking to the M6 II with EF-M 11-22?
I don't own it now, and Canon is no longer making it, so I would have to buy it used, which I prefer not to do.
And I prefer R to M, since Canon is no longer developing M.
Are the body and lens really that outdated or why do you need an additional(!) equivalent offering RIGHT NOW?
I don't absolutely need it right now -- I can wait.
But I'll allow myself a bit of complaining.
So I'll repeat, Canon shouldn't have discontinued the M6II without a replacement.
R100 will rather be low-end, while M6 II is/was rather high-end.
Low-end is fine. I expect the R100 to be similar to the R50, but without EVF.
If you want very small camera the R100 (probably!) would make sense. But the R8 with FF-lens (probably!) is much bigger, heavier and more expensive. What is your goal?
You're absolutely right -- I'm conflicted between APS-C and FF. I'm sure the answer is both.
Wouldn't it make much more sense to look for a compact(?) all in one camera with big sensor and UW-lens (zoom).
I like the modularity of ILC, but I would certainly consider a big-sensor all-in-one. Does anyone know a good one ?
I can consider other brands, but historically Canon does a good job, and I don't want to go even crazier with shopping.
why only DSLM with attached lens?
I'm all for modularity and multiple lenses. But I think 90% of my shots will be 24mm. And I'm more likely to carry a small camera.